瘋法貼vt烤肉分享觀後心得　好歹還會講一下內容
貼英文就直接不翻了　讓大家自己看==
不愧是大公典範　我很尊敬瘋法
※ 引述《wizardfizban (瘋法師)》之銘言：
: Judge dismisses antitrust lawsuit filed against Valve
: https://www.pcgamer.com/judge-dismisses-antitrust-lawsuit-filed-against-valve/
: 之前Valve向法官要求駁回，因為證據完全不足。
: 最新消息就是法官同意了Valve的看法，所以這個反壟斷案被駁回了。
: 駁回的理由在這
: The ruling, available in full on CourtListener, says Wolfire's lawsuit falls
: short on two separate points. First, the claim that Valve is illegally tying
: the Steam store to the platform—essentially, using the near-monopoly of
: Steam as a library, launcher, and social media platform to force people to
: buy games through the Steam storefront—is rejected because the allegations
: in the lawsuit suggest that the Steam platform and storefront are in fact "a
: single product within the integrated game platform and transaction market."
法官認為 Wolfire 有兩點主張，無法讓法官同意
第一點是主張 Valve 把 Steam 商店非法地跟 Steam 平台綁在一起
實質上就是利用 Steam 作為統合遊戲庫、執行器與社群媒體功能的平台，
這種準獨佔性
強迫人們透過 Steam 商店買遊戲
法官反對的原因是認為這主張意味著
Steam 平台和商店實際上就是
「在遊戲（相關服務）整合平台與交易市場中的單一個商品」
: Wolfire's lawsuit also claims that Valve uses its near-monopoly to charge an
: excessive fee to sellers—30%—that wouldn't be sustainable in a competitive
: marketplace. That claim resulted in some interesting conversations earlier
: this year, but the judge rejected the argument, noting that Valve's take has
: remained unchanged throughout Steam's history, even as other online stores
: charging lower percentages have come and gone.
: "Therefore, it would appear that the market reality, at least as plead, is
: that [Valve's] fee is commensurate with the Steam Platform's value to game
: publishers," the ruling states.
Wolfire 第二點主張是說 Valve 用這種準獨佔性要求賣家付出 30% 的高額手續費
在競爭強烈的市場中，對賣家來說是很重的負擔
法官駁回了這個主張
他說從有 Steam 以來，雖然期間也有其他更低抽成的網路商店來來去去，
但 Valve 的抽成比率從未變過
所以法官認為從市場現實來看
（Valve 收的）手續費對於遊戲出版商而言
是符合 Steam 平台的價值的
哀，這個社會是現實的

我又不懂法律 之前自己翻就被噓過 那還不如給懂的弄

應該是找不到中國(X)中文(O)媒體報導的緣故

差個字就有差 我是真不懂 我又沒唸法律 XD

打架

大師

還以為你只會發吃大便文==怎麼全刪了==

所以譯也不行 不譯也不行 你們真難伺候

可惡 我也以為是廢文 結果竟然認真翻喔

我不是大公 謝謝 我願意把時間用在看v

內有噁心 …咦？

昨天的好吃文捏==

好吃文全刪了==

翻譯推

大師 我一直很尊敬自殺peko的文采

這是要轉換形象?

發完一篇刪一篇

好好吃餒

其實法官沒駁回大家才會認真看文吧，不然就快速看過去不會記理由。我又不是讀法律系的

瘋法大 以前在雨港基隆就講錯獨立開發遊戲的定義 燒了好幾天 現在不懂就不翻了 是一種進步耶我覺得不懂不要亂翻比較好