President Donald Trump's bizarre instability was on full display at the7 Summitn France this weekend. When asked whether he had second thoughts about the recent escalation of the trade war with China, heirst answeredaffirmatively, leading to headlines around the world that Trump had softened his position on China. Hours later, his aidelarifiedhat Trump regretted that he hadn't raised tariffs on Chinese goods even higher. Then at his closing G7 press conference, Trump again struck a conciliatory note,
claiming that the Chinese had called US trade officials to return to negotiations, while the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said that they werenawaref any such call.
Trump is a one-man wrecking ball deliberately smashing the rules of global trade, finance, environment and diplomacy. Trump swings back and forth between fury and conciliation, one day calling Chinese President Xi Jinping an enemy and days later a "great leader." If past is prologue, Trump's conciliation today will soon give way to new vitriolic attacks, especially since he naively believes China is about to cave to his high-pressure tactics. China has repeatedly stated it will not cave.
Congress must urgently reassert its constitutional powers before Trump's erratic behavior ruins the US and world economy and further endangers the planet both environmentally and diplomatically.
Trump is smashing the rules of global trade while Congress stays silent
By Jeffrey Sachs forNN Businesserspectives
Updated 1348 GMT (2148 HKT) August 28, 2019
Play Video
Bullard predicts a China trade deal won't end uncertainty
Saudi oil minister: Iran puts global energy supply at risk
US moves to loosen China's grip on rare earth minerals
Trump rips Federal Reserve chief: I have right to fire him
WSJ: US considers ban on 5G equipment made in China
Blackstone CEO: Trade war won't cause a US recession
Shake Shack CEO: We have to plan beyond trade war headlines
India escalates trade fight with US, adds new tariffs
Trump said China called ... apparently they didn't
This is what a trade war looks like
This is the worst case scenario for the US-China trade war
What blacklisting Huawei means for the US-China trade war
Trump's trade war fuels global recession fear
Economist: New China tariffs will hurt US consumers
Global markets rocked by escalating trade fights
Japan escalates trade war with South Korea
Bullard predicts a China trade deal won't end uncertainty
Saudi oil minister: Iran puts global energy supply at risk
US moves to loosen China's grip on rare earth minerals
Trump rips Federal Reserve chief: I have right to fire him
WSJ: US considers ban on 5G equipment made in China
Blackstone CEO: Trade war won't cause a US recession
Shake Shack CEO: We have to plan beyond trade war headlines
India escalates trade fight with US, adds new tariffs
Trump said China called ... apparently they didn't
This is what a trade war looks like
This is the worst case scenario for the US-China trade war
What blacklisting Huawei means for the US-China trade war
Trump's trade war fuels global recession fear
Economist: New China tariffs will hurt US consumers
Global markets rocked by escalating trade fights
Japan escalates trade war with South Korea
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor and director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. The opinions expressed in this commentary are his own.
President Donald Trump's bizarre instability was on full display at the7 Summitn France this weekend. When asked whether he had second thoughts about the recent escalation of the trade war with China, heirst answeredaffirmatively, leading to headlines around the world that Trump had softened his position on China. Hours later, his aidelarifiedhat Trump regretted that he hadn't raised tariffs on Chinese goods even higher. Then at his closing G7 press conference, Trump again struck a conciliatory note,
claiming that the Chinese had called US trade officials to return to negotiations, while the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said that they werenawaref any such call.
Trump is a one-man wrecking ball deliberately smashing the rules of global trade, finance, environment and diplomacy. Trump swings back and forth between fury and conciliation, one day calling Chinese President Xi Jinping an enemy and days later a "great leader." If past is prologue, Trump's conciliation today will soon give way to new vitriolic attacks, especially since he naively believes China is about to cave to his high-pressure tactics. China has repeatedly stated it will not cave.
Congress must urgently reassert its constitutional powers before Trump's erratic behavior ruins the US and world economy and further endangers the planet both environmentally and diplomatically.
Trump has isolated the United States on a rapidly expanding list of major international issues. He has threatened and continues to threaten unilateral tariffs on US allies on the absurd grounds that they are threatening US national security. He unilaterallyrokehe Iran nuclear agreement to the deep dismay of America's European allies and invoked extraterritorial US sanctions on Iran strongly opposed by the most of the world. Hennouncedhe pending US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change,
the only nation of the 195 signatories to do so. He has injured global trade and business investments byttemptingecklessly and provocatively to undermine China's economy.
Last Friday, Trumpweetedhat "Our great American companies are hereby ordered to immediately start looking for an alternative to China, including bringing your companies HOME and making your products in the USA." The Dow immediatelyelly more than 600 points. There is more financial instability to come.
The economic result of Trump's unhinged behavior is instability in US and global financial markets and an impending global downturn.
What is shocking amid all of these wild antics is the near silence of Congress. The Republican silence is perhaps to be expected given the cravenness of Republican politicians in the face of Trump's bullying. But the problem includes the silence of far too many Democrats as well.
Trump is abusing emergency powers in key legislation that previous Congresses should never have extended to the president in the first place. When Trump "hereby ordered" US companies to leave China, he was widely mocked for invoking powers that he lacked. Yet Trump quicklyhot back: "For all of the Fake News Reporters that don't have a clue as to what the law is relative to Presidential powers, China, etc., try looking at the Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. Case closed!"
Trump was referring to the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA). Trump has repeatedly and abusivelynvokedmergency powers under the IEEPA as well as other legislation. The IEEPA grants the president extraordinary powers to prohibit financial transactions with other countries if the president determines that there is an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to US national security, foreign policy, or economy. In a similar manner, the 1962 Trade Expansion Act (TEA),uthorizeshe president to
impose tariffs in response to a national security emergency.
Trump has invoked the TEA to block steel and aluminum imports from several of America's closest allies, following Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross' investigation that concluded imports were so high they would threaten US national security. In reality, those imports pose no national security threat whatsoever. Trump has invoked the IEEPA repeatedly tounish Venezuelaor its human rights violations and to harmran's financial stability. Other presidents have invoked emergencies, but not as broadly,
destructively, or arbitrarily as Trump. Apart from the outcry when Trump tried to declare a national emergency at the southern border under the National Emergencies Act, too few members of Congress have raised objections over Trump's abuses of power in declaring "national emergencies."
It's obvious that Trump is asserting "emergencies" whenever and wherever he chooses, exploiting the dangerously vague language of existing US legislation. He is trying to push US companies out of China not because US investments in China pose a national security threat to the US, but because Trump is naively trying to bend China to his will. The true solution is for Congress is to recognize the danger that Trump's instability poses to the global economy.
The IEEPA is an irresponsible delegation of Congressional power and should be amended. At a minimum, a Presidential declaration of a national emergency should require a concurrent vote by both houses of Congress within 30 days, or else become null and void. Short of such an amendment (which Trump would veto and which the Senate would likely fail to override), Trump's existing (and prospective) invocations of the law can be overturned by a simple concurrent resolution, that is by a majority vote in each
house that does not need the signature of the President. Several of Trump's declarations under the IEEPA have been outrageous and should be overturned.
Congress should certainly reject any future attempt by Trump to invoke the IEEPA to force US businesses to leave China. Such an action would be economically calamitous. The116 billionof US foreign direct investments in China deserve the protections of the US Constitution and US obligations under the rules of the World Trade Organization, including access to American markets. By strongly and forthrightly rejecting Trump's arbitrary declarations of national emergencies, Congress would help to stabilize an
increasingly unsettled world economy and check Trump's repeated abuses of power.