There is a saying: "If there is one, there are two, and it should be three to
be perfectly reasonable." It roughly means that when looking at one thing,
only considered an angles is not enough. And it is still not enough to
observe from two completely opposite angles.
It may not be enough to observe from two completely opposite angles. But, if
we can observe from three different angles,
Only by observing and thinking one thing in three or more than three
different point of view over and over again, we can reach a conclusion that
is perfect and reasonable.
Regarding this statement, is there any fallacy in my explanation? What's your
view?