https://i.imgur.com/VH8QRfO.gif
https://i.imgur.com/oAztRki.gif
補一些評論
網友A : "When u look at videos like these you realize all these penalties are in
reality for the outcome rather than the action of any driver.
當您觀看此類影片時，您會意識到所有這些處罰實際上都是針對結果而不是任何駕駛員的
行為。
Max knew how to stay away from Sainz thus avoiding contact, Norris stayed put
while having much more room to play with and got hit thus Max got a penalty.
馬克斯知道如何遠離塞恩斯來避免碰撞，諾里斯更激進的留在原地，雖然旁邊還有空間，
並被碰撞，因此馬克斯受罰。
And all the Media love to paint one side as villain and another as the hero,
this has been the case with F1 for decades."
所有媒體都喜歡把一方描繪成惡棍，另一方描繪成英雄，幾十年來F1都是如此。
網友B :
The same thing happened with Vettel and Lewis as well with the squeezing.
同樣的事情也發生在維特爾和漢米爾頓身上(2018)。
I really think that Max did nothing more than what we see a million other
times when drivers squeeze each other and I do think that Lando had room to
go on the kerb.
我真的認為馬克斯所做的只不過是我們在其他一百萬次車手互相擠壓時看到的事情，而且
我確實認為蘭多在路邊有空間。
網友C : true. It can be said for both the moving under braking and the divebombs.
真的。對於煞車變線和魚雷炸彈都是如此。
If Norris doesn't move when Max is moving under braking, they crash, get
damaged, and both lose out.
如果諾里斯在麥克斯煞車時不動，他們就會撞車、車壞掉，然後雙雙退賽。
If Max doesn't avoid when Lando pulls off a divebomb, they crash, get
damaged, and both lose out.
如果麥克斯在蘭多發射魚雷時沒有躲避，他們就會撞車、受損，然後一樣雙退。
IMO this is also why it's important to actually punish for the incident,
rather than only when it causes a crash as the penalties will rarely/never be
severe enough to make up for whatever you lose as a result of a collision.
在我看來，這也是為什麼對事故進行實際懲罰很重要，而不僅僅是在事故造成
車損(退賽)時才進行懲罰，因為懲罰很少/永遠不會嚴重到足以彌補碰撞造成的任何損失。
原貼 : https://reurl.cc/gGX3Lp