大家好，想請教一則短篇閱讀:
There have been numerous well-documented extinctions of indigenous species
caused by the introduction of non-indigenous predators and pathogens.
However, surprisingly few extinctions of indigenous species can be attributed
to competition from introduced species.
For example, during the past 400 years, 4,000 plant species have been introduced
into North America, and these non-indigenous plants currently account for nearl
y 20 percent of North America's plant species.
Yet no evidence exists that any indigenous North American plant species became
extinct as a result of competition from new
species could mean that such extinctions take longer to occur than scientists
initially believed or, alternatively, that extinctions are rarely caused by
competition from non-indigenous species.
題目是:
The passage is concerned primarily with:
A pointing out that a particular type of species extinction is rarely known to
occur.
B proposing a possible explanation for conflicting data about a particular
type of species extinction.
C resolving a debate about the frequency of a particular type of species
extinction.
D comparing two theories regarding possible causes of a particular type of
species extinction.
E refuting a proposed explanation for the increasingly rare occurrence of a
particular type of species extinction.
主要是想問A和B兩個選項，考滿分答案給A，但我認為B選項也沒有錯，conflicting data
就是非原生種沒有造成原生種滅絕的數據，所以作者在最後一句話給了一個解釋，所以我
認為B選項也是對的QQ，想請教版上大大幫忙解惑，謝謝。