Re: [新聞] 經濟自由化停滯不前 華爾街日報批台灣「

作者: always0410 (everything)   2014-08-06 17:49:16
: 推 mmzznnxxbbcc:求原文 為什麼新聞後面都變成經濟部強調 經濟部分析 08/06 17:16
網址 http://ppt.cc/FL6v
這篇在WSJ網站是要付費的
標題: Taiwan Leaves Itself Behind
副標題:Ratifying a pact with China is the first step to diversified trade.
Taiwan's leaders have warned for years that economic isolation will damage
the nation's competitiveness. Now their worst fears may be coming true, and
the consequences of resisting freer trade and economic reform are becoming
clear.
Later this year China and South Korea plan to finalize a free-trade agreement
that will give most South Korean products zero-tariff entry into the
mainland. That's a problem for Taiwan because both countries count China as
their largest trading partner, and their exporters compete head-to-head.
Between 50% and 80% of Taiwan's exports—from petrochemicals to steel,
textiles to machinery—overlap with South Korea's.
If the deal goes through as expected, roughly 2% to 5% of all of Taiwan's
exports to China could be replaced by South Korean products, according to the
Ministry of Economic Affairs. Businesses with thin profit margins such as
makers of flat panels and machinery are at risk of being priced out of the
mainland market.
Meanwhile, Taiwan's latest trade pact with China signed last year sits in
limbo after the student-led "sunflower movement" stymied its ratification by
the legislature this spring. Protesters stoked anxieties that Taiwan is in
danger of being swallowed up by China as its businesses become increasingly
dependent on the mainland.
It's certainly true that the two economies are deeply intertwined; 80% of
Taiwan's foreign investment and 40% of its exports go to the mainland.
However, placing obstacles in the way of trade and investment won't solve the
problem.
Since China is an integral part of global supply chains, Taiwan only hurts
itself if it preserves barriers to cross-Strait trade. Beijing has also
signalled it will lobby against Taiwan's participation in multilateral pacts
such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership if Taipei doesn't first liberalize with
China. So the road to less reliance on China paradoxically runs through
Beijing.
Taiwan has made some progress on bilateral trade. But pacts with Singapore
and New Zealand over the past year, while welcome, govern less than $30
billion in annual two-way exchange. A South Korea-China FTA threatens up to
$49 billion of Taiwan's exports, according to the Ministry of Economic
Affairs.
Ratifying the cross-Strait services pact now in limbo would pave the way for
a goods trade agreement. It would also show that Taipei has the ability to
ratify and implement trade accords it has signed.
In the meantime, Taipei has started to liberalize the domestic economy in
line with reforms required by TPP. That deal currently involves 12 nations
and 40% of the world's output. Neither Taiwan nor South Korea currently
participates in the negotiations, but both have expressed interest in joining.
Here, too, Seoul has the advantage, having already signed a free-trade
agreement with the U.S. with an eye on many of the stringent TPP
requirements. If Taiwan rewrites outdated regulations and rolls back
restrictions on investment, it can promote domestic competitiveness and
signal that Taipei is serious about joining the TPP.
But first Taiwan's lawmakers have a chance to use a special legislative
session this week to pass a bill promised to protesters to monitor
cross-Strait treaties, and then ratify the cross-Strait services trade pact.
As trade barriers among Taiwan's neighbors fall, failing to do so will
further isolate the island.
重點
中韓的FTA趨近於完成
但中台的貿易依存度高,台韓產業的替代性也高,目前停滯不前的狀態會讓台灣自傷
沒有先簽下服貿,北京可能不會讓台灣進入TPP
目前台灣正在往加入TPP的部分,符合其要件這邊在努力
※註:TPP要衡量欲加入的國家之經貿開放程度、相關法規....
韓國目前也在拼TPP這一塊,韓國的優勢在於他們已經跟美國洽簽的FTA
補充一下
除了TPP跨太平洋夥伴協定外,現在也在找歐盟洽簽經濟合作協議
比較奇怪的是中國、日本、韓國、澳大利亞、新西蘭、印度跟東南亞國家的RCEP
好像就無聲無息了
華爾街日報在美國商業新聞的位階,應該算是最高
不輸彭博、路透
作者: gino0717 (gino0717)   2014-08-06 17:51:00
簡單來說就是阿扁該死
作者: Cervelo1995 (........)   2014-08-06 17:51:00
沒人說不簽, 是籤的過程政府完全亂搞阿
作者: allen0080 (漫漫長路)   2014-08-06 17:51:00
可惜了你這麼認真,大部分人卻只想拿它來吵架!
作者: darksaber   2014-08-06 17:51:00
猴子只會說這是黨工付錢買的新聞
作者: rookiecop   2014-08-06 17:53:00
放 Review & Outlook 算是什麼? 專欄? 主編評論?
作者: germing   2014-08-06 17:55:00
美國有所謂的季辛吉路線 一慣親中 一生訪中六七十次 他的路線也有眾多繼承人 有的媒體會為中國發聲 還有就是中韓談了N年 中台只談一年
作者: takuminauki (蚊子)   2014-08-06 18:02:00
中韓2012年才正式談判 根本沒好幾年韓美FTA只談15個月...
作者: sading7 (sading7)   2014-08-06 18:04:00
蚊子又在瞎扯 美韓FTA談判時程網路上都查得到
作者: germing   2014-08-06 18:04:00
2005年博鰲論談就開始討論了然後年年官方辦共同研究會 不滿意還可打回重談 台灣是一字不能改 絕不能重談 想殖民就說吧
作者: takuminauki (蚊子)   2014-08-06 18:07:00
韓美2006年2月正式談判 2007年4月簽訂出處 童振源<<台灣經濟關鍵下一步>>時間要從正式談判算起 童教授的書也是這樣算
作者: KimJongUn (金正恩)   2014-08-06 18:13:00
華爾街日報記者明顯是黨工
作者: takuminauki (蚊子)   2014-08-06 18:14:00
不管寫的是誰 都是事實 TPP美國官員講白了 請先大開放跟美國簽FTA也一定是自己要先開台灣在國際地位不明 內部又內耗惡鬥 離亡國不遠
作者: germing   2014-08-06 18:20:00
你說的那條並沒有在亡國途徑之外

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com