Re: [爆卦] 周守訓:柯P為何可以收連家紅酒?

作者: edwdada (Ravior)   2014-11-17 15:37:57
※ 引述《nogood (nogood)》之銘言:
: 三立前進新台灣
: 周守訓放大絕:柯P身為公立醫院醫生
: 為何可以收連家紅酒?
: 難道這不應該調查嗎?巴啦巴啦....
: 抓到了,柯P收禮!
: ※註:有電視或媒體有報導者,請勿使用爆卦! 違者視為新聞篇數 超貼新聞劣退
AMA code of medical ethics
10.017
Gift from Patients
Gifts that patients offer to physicians are often an expression of
appreciation and gratitude or a reflection of cultural tradition, and can
enhance the patient-physician relationship.
Some gifts signal psychological needs that require the physician’s
attention. Some patients may attempt to influence care or to secure
preferential treatment through the offering of gifts or cash. Acceptance of
such gifts is likely to damage the integrity of the patient-physician
relationship. Physicians should make clear that gifts given to secure
preferential treatment compromise their obligation to provide services in a
fair manner.
There are no definitive rules to determine when a physician should or should
not accept a gift. No fixed value determines the appropriateness or
inappropriateness of a gift from a patient; however, the gift’s value
relative to the patient’s or the physician’s means should not be
disproportionately or inappropriately large. One criterion is whether the
physician would be comfortable if acceptance of the gift were known to
colleagues or the public.
Physicians should be cautious if patients discuss gifts in the context of a
will. Such discussions must not influence the patient’s medical care.
If, after a patient’s death, a physician should learn that he or she has
been bequeathed a gift, the physician should consider declining the gift if
the physician believes that its acceptance would present a significant
hardship (financial or emotional) to the family.
The interaction of these various factors is complex and requires the
physician to consider them sensitively. (I, II)
Link:
http://ppt.cc/3l0a
第三段提到,醫生是否該收受病人的禮物,沒有一個明確的標準,也沒有固定的數值
去定義恰當與不恰當,而禮物的價值取決於醫生和病人,但不該不成比例的過大,有
一個標準是,醫生能不能舒坦的向同事或公眾表明他們收下了這個禮物
也就是說,收禮物和柯文哲的醫療行為(假設連營認為有),有沒有不成比例的過大?
而公評這個比例有沒有過大一個蠻好用的指標就是,醫生能不能舒坦的告訴大家他們
有收受這個禮物
看起來柯文哲是不介意人家知道他有收這個禮物
那就讓民眾公評,收這樣一個禮品,算不算禮物價值與醫療行為不成比例
當然啦,這是美國的醫學倫理標準
給各位參考
作者: zsh (乙太公)   2014-11-17 15:38:00
直接抓去關吧 不用選了
作者: LIZEN310321 (【海虎】台中梁朝偉)   2014-11-17 15:38:00
你拿美國的刀 來斬台灣的醫生?
作者: potionx (YEN YUAN-YEN)   2014-11-17 15:38:00
說真的,聖文的命只值幾瓶紅酒嗎?
作者: wingthink (蒼天的巴爾孟克)   2014-11-17 15:38:00
要關送禮的人嗎!?
作者: ge0619mini (顆顆)   2014-11-17 15:39:00
我們有我們的玩法
作者: sandiato (當局者迷迷迷)   2014-11-17 15:39:00
你釣出一堆黑名單,厲害
作者: boykid (哀哀~~~)   2014-11-17 15:40:00
一家有錢人送個大禮感謝醫生很正常
作者: Puye (PUYE)   2014-11-17 15:40:00
美國標準 台灣不適用 謝謝指教
作者: JointBank (噓~ 不要問!)   2014-11-17 15:41:00
快報警 有人用酒買票
作者: aarzbrv (我愛鑽石光! 芒! 長!~~)   2014-11-17 15:42:00
要支持kp歡迎,但要把某國制度當聖旨那叫殖民地買辦
作者: kingaden (XxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxX)   2014-11-17 15:42:00
可是 馬自己的黨主席都拿美國憲法來說了耶
作者: snowcoat (excess)   2014-11-17 15:43:00
這時候就要比例原則了 20萬之於連根本比魯肉飯還便宜...
作者: aarzbrv (我愛鑽石光! 芒! 長!~~)   2014-11-17 15:43:00
之前有臺灣旅美醫師羨慕MG149制度時怎麼就不用美國標準?
作者: ringtweety (tark)   2014-11-17 15:43:00
救了槍傷的送禮 然後再以連家的財產來說 我覺得還OK吧
作者: cyber0305 (下一步的方向)   2014-11-17 15:44:00
一樓活在專制獨裁的社會嗎??
作者: lglonly (煉妖狐)   2014-11-17 15:47:00
先關一樓.不用選人了.
作者: siqzo1 (text523)   2014-11-17 15:49:00
鬧大一點,拜托!讓我看看連還能多下限!
作者: Zeroyeu (凌羽)   2014-11-17 16:27:00
一瓶20鎂的紅酒,可見連家小氣慣了,後悔不送20萬的吧?

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com