※ 引述《okura (大倉)》之銘言：
: 1.媒體來源:
: 英國dailymail
: 2.完整新聞標題:
: Is deep space travel a step closer to reality? Nasa reveals successful test
: of 'impossible' fuel-free engine that breaks the laws of physics
長遠太空旅行是否更有可能於現實中? Nasa宣布 在這看似不可能的無燃料引擎試驗成功
似乎已經打破物理法則
: 3.完整新聞內文:
: 摘要:
: EM Drive Fuel-free engine could take a spacecraft to Mars in 10 weeks.
: Creates thrust by bouncing microwaves in chamber, using solar power.
: Nasa has conducted more tests using an improved experimental process.
: Test designed to remove errors from earlier study but still produced thrust.
: Scientists still aren't sure how this happens as it defies the laws of physics.
:
搭載EM drive 無燃料引擎的火箭到火星需十禮拜 藉由太陽光所生產生的微波增幅動力
NASA 現在已經建立數個實驗引擎 試圖改善該引擎早期測試的諸多問題
科學家仍不能確定這到底如何發生好像是它打破了物理定律
全文:
: An 'impossible' fuel-free engine, which could take a humans to Mars in just
: 10 weeks, is still defying science after another batch of tests by Nasa
: suggested the thruster does work.
: The so-called EM Drive creates thrust by bouncing microwaves around in an
: enclosed chamber, and uses only solar power.
: When the concept was first proposed, it was considered implausible because it
: went against the laws of physics - and subsequent tests of the engine have
: shown that the idea could revolutionise space travel.
這引擎可能會改寫太空旅程的進展
: Now Nasa has provided the first update on the test in months, and it seems to
: suggest that the futuristic engine does, in fact, work.
: Scientists, however, still don't know why.
NASA將會提供第一段的測試數據在數個月內
但科學家們仍不知道其原因
: The update was given by Paul March, one of the top engineers working the EM
: Drive thruster at the Eagleworks Laboratory at the Johnson Space Center in
: Texas.
Paul 是這方面頂尖的科學家 在德州的強納森太空中心
: He said Nasa has managed to remove some of the errors from earlier tests -
: but still found signals of unexplained thrust.
: Among the criticisms of previous experiments were that the tests were not
: carried out in a vacuum, thereby mirroring the conditions in space.
: But the latest Nasa test appears to have addressed these concerns.
: March's announcement is the first direct announcement in months, with the
: space agency largely remaining silent about any developments on the
: controversial project.
他說仍有數個問題存於現在的早期測試 但發現有個不知從何而來的推力
儘管有許多批評包括早期測試不在真空中
因此更不接近於太空的條件
但NASA 的數據顯示 太空中的真空條件更有利於該爭議性計畫
: March posted on the Nasa Spaceflight forum in reply to an unpublished paper
: that claims the unaccounted thrust is generated by something known as the
: Lorentz force.
: The Lorentz force is the force that is exerted by a magnetic field on a
: moving electric charge.
: But March says his tests prove this is not true.
: 'I will tell you that we first built and installed a second generation,
: closed face magnetic damper that reduced the stray magnetic fields in the
: vacuum chamber by at least an order of magnitude and any Lorentz force
: interactions it could produce,' he said
: 'And yet the anomalous thrust signals remain.'
: March also says that in the latest developments, thermal expansion of the
: thruster is taken into account to reduce all possible sources of error.
Paul March 在 NASA 太空論壇上回應關於一篇論文 該論文宣稱 那種未知推力有點像
勞倫茲力
勞倫茲力 來自於 運動電荷在磁場中所產生的一種推力
但March 確認為他的測試顯示那論文是錯的
他說"我告訴你們 我認為我們建造的是一種第二代的引擎 其磁阻接近勞倫茲力並
減少磁場的迷散在真空中 生產至少一股以上的磁場與勞倫茲力的的交互作用所能
產生的作用力
但我們的不尋常的推力是可維持"
他也提到 最新的發展 我們仍試圖在熱膨脹理論上找出渦輪上問題
並減少其推力來源錯誤可能
本魯不負責任翻譯:
: 到月球只要4小時
: 到火星只要10個禮拜
: 此種動力只需以太陽光發電即可
: 完全不需運載任何燃料
: 科學家說其原理至今仍然不明
: 4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
: 本魯不會縮網址
: 2ch
: http://daily.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1447005750/-100
: 打開此網頁後有詳細新聞連結共4個
: 5.備註:
: 阿共成天妄想打老美根本呵呵
簡單翻一下 我不學物理的 有些不確定有沒有翻錯
只是測試好嗎= =