推 yftsai: 現在LSE和倫大都否認有口試資料了 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:44
→ yftsai: 那法官看的那個口試資料是哪裡來的顆顆 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:44
yftsai 就是屬於不看法官駁回上訴判決書的眾多論文仔之一啦 XDDDDDDDDDDD
推 yftsai: 還有倫敦大學之前說圖書館改建遺失了 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:49
→ yftsai: 現在怎麼變成沒收到過 36.239.21.73 01/15 07:49
因為追查到最後，發現沒有口委把論文轉交給圖書館的紀錄吧
也可能是沒紀錄用推論的啦，M01 的 turtlins 在追查倫敦大學那些未收到的論文後也
做出同樣的推論啦，因為只剩這種可能才會導致圖書館沒有留下紀錄啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDD
判決書也是寫類似的內容
As explained above, it does appear from the evidence that copies of the thesis
may not have been provided to the libraries at the time by the examiners,
rather than having been lost or mis-shelved.
噓 eulogy: 判決書哪裡有寫法官有看到口委簽名 別造 220.129.216.46 01/15 08:57
→ eulogy: 謠好嗎 220.129.216.46 01/15 08:57
兩個法官駁回兩次上訴，駁回理查森上訴的判決書就有寫了啦 XDDDDDDDDDD
In accordance with the guidance in Browning, the tribunal records that the
closed bundle is limited to a document containing the requested information
i.e. the names of the examiners and the date the examiners signed approval of
the thesis.
論文仔就繼續無視法官判決書啦，畢竟現實對你們來說太殘酷了 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
噓 tontontonni: 造謠？ 39.8.134.191 01/15 08:58
→ tontontonni: 判決書哪裡有寫法官說有論文？ 39.8.134.191 01/15 08:59
都有口委簽名文件了，還會沒有論文？ XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
As explained above, it does appear from the evidence that copies of the thesis
may not have been provided to the libraries at the time by the examiners,
rather than having been lost or mis-shelved. However, this does not mean that
the University has provided inaccurate information about the fact that
President Tsai was awarded a PhD degree. There is also nothing to suggest that
the correct number of bound copies were not provided by President Tsai prior to
the viva examination.
順帶一提，判決書這邊寫的 correct number of bound copies 是兩本啦，而不是論文
仔一再宣稱的三個圖書館都要有，當年 LSE 圖書館不是收藏學生論文的地方啦 XDDDDD
噓 DanceLove: 哇 特地回一篇反擊，如果覺得論文仔們 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
→ DanceLove: 再搞，不用那麼緊張吧 哈哈。而且學校 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
→ DanceLove: 沒收到論文會讓學生畢業，還能授予博士 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
→ DanceLove: 學位？那倫敦大學用什麼當依據呢？ 114.45.24.78 01/15 09:11
校方認證的學位，只有論文仔才會覺得別人在緊張啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
用口委簽名文件當依據給學位有什麼問題嗎？ XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
論文遺失明明就不是大事，只有論文仔才會搞了兩年多還不願面對事實啦 XDDDDDDDDDD
噓 ramirez: 論文在轉交環節消失了咧 證據在那？ 42.77.211.241 01/15 09:41
阿就查不到入館紀錄啊 XDDDDDDDDDDD
有口委簽名文件就足以證明當年有論文了啦 XDDDDDDDDDDD
更別提 IALS 1985 年出版的論文目錄也有記載蔡的論文題目啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
再不然論文仔有種去找孫玉文求證阿，看看孫玉文當年引用論文時看到的論文到底是整
本論文還是一頁一頁的原稿，不過論文仔心虛不敢去找孫玉文求證啦 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
噓 naiveman: 你是本人嗎？為什麼你要護航？死忠的喔223.138.140.219 01/15 10:21
論文仔就繼續不看判決書嘛 XDDDDDDDDDDDD
噓 tontontonni: 所以論文消失了？你怎麼知道？ 39.8.134.191 01/15 10:32
→ tontontonni: 誰托夢給你 39.8.134.191 01/15 10:32
論文仔就繼續不信法官判決書寫的內容阿 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
噓 aul4xu44: 判決書哪裡有寫有論文？ 塔綠班還在騙？ 218.172.159.37 01/15 11:05
法官都看過口委簽名文件了還在沒有論文 XDDDDDDDDD
噓 annie06045: 又來了 你打高端了沒 114.34.125.248 01/15 16:58
唸到碩博士還無法實事求是，可憐吶 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD