其實吵這個沒意義
不管幾點發的，或是有沒有網軍
重點是這篇是發在倫敦大學網頁
代表倫敦大學官方立場
所以重點在其內容
再重貼一次
University of London statement on missing thesis
Dr Tsai Ing-wen, who is now the President of Taiwan, was awarded a PhD in
February 1984 following the submission and examination of her thesis by two
examiners. While it remains unclear whether copies were deposited with the
University’s library, that has no bearing on Dr Tsai’s PhD, which was
correctly awarded.
The University categorically denies any allegations of wrongdoing or
falsehood made against any member of staff in relation to the search for
copies of this thesis. All University of London staff who have handled
enquiries related to this thesis have done so with the utmost integrity.
LSE has an electronic copy of the thesis available to access via their online
thesis system - LSE Theses Online(Opens in new window).
標題說的，missing thesis，指的是1983年那本藍皮書
第一句說有口試，口委也有上交論文
第二句說不清楚副本有沒有存放於圖書館，但不影響蔡英文的學位
接著第二段說的是倫大確認其職員在搜尋論文副本時沒有任何不法或錯誤
但我不曉得第二段聲明有沒有包含倫大檔案管理Suzie
因為Suzie 曾經搜尋過這本論文
並確認倫敦大學圖書館未曾收到論文(from examiner)
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_publication_date_of_tsai_ing#
明顯和第一段的聲明牴觸
同樣的結論其實在林環牆教授兩年前的報告就有了
當時也是請倫敦大學圖書館員搜尋，一樣的結論
最後一段說有電子版的論文
因為標題開宗明義就講了論文遺失了
那2019年出現的電子版顯然不能證明曾有這本藍皮書的存在
最後，論文有沒有存放於圖書館不影響學位
但是若是Suzie講的"論文從未交到圖書館"
也不影響學位嗎？
這才是倫敦大學應該回答的問題