來源: https://richardsonreports.wordpress.com/
文長 挑重點翻一下
" "當中的文字屬於判決書內容
Information Review Tribunal Judge Alison McKenna overturned the Information
Commissioner and found that the London School of Economics violated the Freedom
of Information Act.
英國行政法院法官McKenna推翻了英國資訊專員辦公室的說詞並認為倫敦大學違反了資訊
自由法
"LSE confirmed to the Tribunal that it holds President Tsai's student file,
comprising 278 pages. It stated that there is a letter on this file in which
a person appears to self-identify as one of the Viva examiners, but that it
has no official notification from University of London whether this
information was correct, and it holds no information on the identity of the
co-examiner."
"LSE向行政法院確認說他們持有蔡總統的278頁的學生紀錄表，其中一封信提到一位人士自
認為是蔡英文的其中一位博士口試委員，但是沒有任何倫敦大學的官方文字確認這個資訊
是正確的，而且學生紀錄表中沒有另一位口試委員的資訊。"
"As we have concluded that information is held, the correct course is for LSE
to issue a fresh response on the basis that information within the scope of
the request is held, and at that stage either disclose the requested
information (with contextual commentary, if necessary) or claim any
exemptions to disclosure that it considers apply."
"由於我們已確認LSE持有被要求的資訊，正確的做法是LSE根據原告的要求(公開蔡總統的
口試委員)從新給予答覆，或是LSE解釋他們有豁免權可以不公開的原因。"
"We allow this appeal on the basis of the Appellant's first ground of
appeal, that the Decision Notice was erroneous in its conclusion that
information was not held."
"我們因此允許原告(Richardson, 彭P等)第一輪的上訴，並認為之前英國資訊專員辦公室
裁定通知的結論說LSE沒有蔡英文口委的資訊，是錯誤的。"
Judge McKeena ordered the London School of Economics to respond within 28
days.
法官McKenna要求LSE在28天內提供所被要求的回覆。