我看到很多人在問是不是媒體翻譯錯了
https://reurl.cc/yD45Eq
可以看一下這篇經濟學人雜誌寫的
To end birthright citizenship, Trump misreads the constitution
https://imgur.com/uGdNNrb
https://imgur.com/hDTgwB0
Under Mr Trump’s order, from next month the federal government will refuse
to issue “documents recognising American citizenship” (presumably
passports) to newborns unless they have one parent who is either a citizen or
a permanent resident of the United States. The children of unauthorised
immigrants born in America would thus be excluded. But so too would those of
around 3m people living in America on exchange, work or student visas.
經濟學人應該不會錯 所以是包含交換學者, 工作簽證, 學生簽的子女都無法獲得公民權
有人會問說這是否違反黃金德案跟十四修正案?
十四修正案Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
說明只有受其管轄權約束者才得以享有出生公民權,
現在共和黨也是以該項基本來挑戰
十四修正案, 主張非法移民不受管轄權的約束
但其他簽證就比較難說就看大法官如何解釋
黃金案則是主張黃金德父母皆為合法居留身分(商人)
現在美國大法官多數為保守派, 所以結果也很難說
不知道有沒有人還想討論這方面的卦