http://tinyurl.com/llfva7j
Los Angeles Times
March 23, 2014, 3:45 p.m.
While the standoff continued at the legislature, a group broke into the
government’s main executive building Sunday night, reaching Premier Jiang
Yi-huah’s office. They clashed with police, who eventually cleared the
building. About 70 protesters and police officers were treated at nearby
hospitals for minor injuries.
當立法院僵局持續，一個團體在星期日晚上闖入行政院大樓，進到了江宜樺院長
的辦公室。他們與警方起了衝突，警方最終淨空了整幢建築物，大約有70個抗議者
和警察在附近的醫院治療輕微的受傷。
====
標題前段和後段沒關係，哦，就兩則無相關的小品，上面是血腥鎮壓，下面是台灣之光
====
這則比較早，王院長+民進黨立委紅到經濟學人去了，真台灣之光
http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2014/03/politics-taiwan
Economist
Mar 20th 2014, 11:02 by Banyan | TAIPEI
It is already highly unusual for a government to have tolerated the seizure
of parliament by protesters for so long. But, fearful of the ugly headlines
using force against peaceful students would attract, it does not have many
easy options.
對一個政府來說，能忍受抗議者奪取國會這麼久(120小時)是件相當異常的事。
然而，畏懼於以武力對付和平的學生可能會引來不名譽的頭條，並沒有多少簡
單的選項可以選擇。
(新增1)
The sit-in was provoked by what the DPP sees as the KMT’s breaking of its
promise to allow a parliamentary committee to review the agreement clause by
clause.
靜坐群聚被"民進黨認為國民黨毀棄委員會內逐條審查的承諾"所激怒
(譯按：UCCU，economist都知道逐條審查是318暴民的主張
新一期的economist還沒出來，馬開記者會承諾逐條審查economist一定會看到
人無信是畜生，318暴民準備丟臉丟到economist去了，UCCU
再來，只能嘆息再嘆息
economist談到"國民黨毀棄逐條審查的承諾"，都會知道引出處是民進黨說的
台霉一定自已扣帽子加上去以為自已是神..精病
台灣會亂，媒體8成，公道價)