[閒聊] Tidal ‘HiFi’ is NOT lossless

作者: cynx1337 (28y2h92f)   2021-12-25 06:10:08
TLDR: Tidal ‘HiFi’ is not lossless. It just streams the MQA version of track
s with some metadata removed to prevent most DACs from recognising it as MQA a
nd limits streaming to 16 bit.
A while ago I posted a video which discussed how MQA was not lossless, and add
itionally, how there was actually no way to stream the lossless version of any
track on TIDAL that was marked with the ‘MASTER’ label, even if you had all
settings configured not to use MQA.
Example of a track tagged as ‘MASTER’ on TIDAL.
The issue was that depending on your settings, one of a few things happened:
– ‘MASTER’ quality setting – Track streamed in MQA. Tidal client or your
DAC can do the unfolding depending on setup. MQA is not lossless. – ‘HiFi
’ quality setting – Track streamed in what was claimed to be ‘lossless’, b
ut it was actually seemingly just the MQA version without any MQA flagging or
metadata, so it would not be unfolded. And is also not lossless. – ‘High/No
rmal’ – Track streamed in compressed format.
原文網址
https://goldensound.audio/2021/11/29/tidal-hifi-is-not-lossless/
作者: mikemagic88 (Mikemagic88)   2021-12-25 06:53:00
鴿子封包
作者: sputnik0083 (sputnik)   2021-12-25 07:13:00
蛤?
作者: reggae6433 (moore1021)   2021-12-25 07:25:00
If you want to stream lossless, other services such as Qobuz and Amazon HD are better choices.
作者: buyao531 (Buyao)   2021-12-25 08:02:00
也lag太久 差點以為是洗文章就要噓下去了
作者: Loliprpr (Akiya)   2021-12-25 08:12:00
全文複製貼上這樣也一篇?
作者: GLUESTICK (口紅膠)   2021-12-25 10:35:00
你抓個重點幾句翻譯不行?
作者: Lofiman (低端疫苗)   2021-12-25 12:59:00
已知用火
作者: a951l753vin (qmo.shuo4)   2021-12-25 13:30:00
作者: callTM (TMD)   2021-12-25 14:57:00
他誰….他說不是lossless 就不是喔 搞笑。 那我說是你要信嗎
作者: jeeyi345 (letmein)   2021-12-25 16:18:00
我覺得是細節爆炸 gainmore
作者: epiphyte (Dancing shoes)   2021-12-25 21:11:00
也op太久

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com