借用一下土龍大大翻譯的五大訴求
https://reurl.cc/mDqOZW
The LCSPA has made several requests – here’s how we’ve addressed them
I also want to address the five demands from the LCSPA, with the responses that
we also provided the LCSPA today:
LOL職業聯賽的全球負責人Naz Aletaha
https://i.imgur.com/Yv8IXyQ.png
對LCSPA五大訴求的回覆
Institute VALORANT style promotion and relegation between LCS and NACL.
Expanding the league in order to implement a VALORANT-style visitor slot system
would run counter to our existing partnership model with the 10 LCS teams who pa
id ~$10M per slot to compete in the league. It would dilute LCS teams’ equity a
nd put considerable downward pressure on the amount of revenue (our “League Rev
enue Pool”) that we share with the teams. More teams in the pool would dilute t
he revenues that we share 50% with our teams under the partnership model. Given
the challenging macroeconomic climate, expanding the league is not a good idea a
t this time.
在LCS與NACL間建立類特戰英豪(Valorant)現行的升降制度(已經聯盟化繳交保證金的隊伍不
會參與升降)
LCS回覆:NO
理由:這樣有違聯盟化(每隊支付10M的入場費)，且以往聯盟是和戰隊五五分潤，在加進隊伍
，各隊分的錢又更少惹
Riot guarantees LCS minimum contracts for the following year
for five players who win NACL Summer Finals.
Guaranteed LCS contracts for winners aren’t a necessary component of a healthy
developmental league. LCS teams are in the best position to decide who should ge
t a shot. We will continue to discuss initiatives to connect LCS to NACL players
like we have in place with Scouting Grounds. Players should rise to the LCS bas
ed on merit, potential, and team fit rather than an artificially forced mechanis
m, and our focus will be on finding ways to increase the flexibility and mobilit
y of that movement rather than forcing it.
Riot給予獲得夏季冠軍的隊伍陣中五名選手下一年度的LCS最低薪資保障合約
LCS回覆:NO
要和誰簽約應該交由各戰隊自行決定，而且冠軍保障合約並非一個健康發展聯盟的必要組成
，選手能不能留在LCS應該是看其能力，而非強制規定
Institute a 3/5 continuity rule to provide players on released NACL rosters firs
t priority in maintaining their slots in the upcoming NACL season if a majority
continue to compete together.
Teams provide greater continuity and structure, and therefore we will continue w
ith our policy of slot ownership residing with organizations rather than players
.
當NACL隊伍不繼續經營或被釋出時，該隊伍陣中至少需要保留3名原始隊伍的選手，他們將
被承接的隊伍優先聘用
LCS回覆:NO
Riot commit to a revenue pool for player salaries of $300,000 per NACL team, per
year.
This ask is for multiple millions in subsidies for the NACL. That simply isn’t
sustainable – and to be brutally honest, it shouldn’t be necessary. We have ot
her Tier 2 leagues around the world which thrive on their own, and we believe th
e NACL can get to that place too.
What we will do is help the North American scene through this transition. So, as
I mentioned above, we will be investing in a bridge period by providing a speci
al, one-time payment of $300,000 to the NACL’s Tournament Operator (Rally Cry)
to support NACL teams during the transition to the new structure.
Riot提供每支NACL隊伍每年30萬美金的補助用於支付選手薪資
LCS回覆:NO
這要求代表要給NACL每年幾百萬美金的補貼
這基本上是不可能長期維持的
而且這不應該是必要的
我們在世界各地還有其他的 2 級聯賽，它們依靠自己的力量蓬勃發展
我們相信 NACL 也可以達到那個水平
但為了幫助LCS度過這次難關，我們會發一次性30萬鎂給NACL
Allow LCS orgs to partner with affiliates for cost-sharing.
We’ve seen examples of partnerships between pro teams and Tier 2 teams across t
he globe result in greater upward mobility of pros and more sustainable Tier 2 e
cosystems. That is why we already, and will continue to, allow affiliate relatio
nships to exist between teams in LCS and NACL (for example, Golden Guardians & A
rea of Effect).
Riot允許LCS隊伍與其他機構如業餘隊伍或大學合作(Aka. 共同營運)以減輕隊伍負擔
LCS回覆:YES
現在就是繼續讓一隊二隊合作呀
—
https://twitter.com/arshgoyal13/status/1663691605776420865
[Sources] LCS staff