Nightengale: Cabrera easy MVP choice

作者: abc12812   2012-10-03 22:01:58
http://tinyurl.com/92tfnym
Please, my fellow voters of the Baseball Writers' Association of America,
can't we all get along?
大家別吵囉
Yes, I believe there is one rational AL choice when voters are required to
submit their MVP ballots after today's games.
我相信合理的MLB選擇已經出來了
His name is Miguel Cabrera.
就是Cabrera
There's no need for name-calling. But, honestly, I don't believe the race is
close.
競爭完全不激烈
Never in my wildest dreams did I envision a need to justify an MVP award for
a man who's poised to become the first player since the Boston Red Sox's Carl
Yastrzemski in 1967 to win a Triple Crown, all while leading his team to the
American League Central title.
成為1967年後首位三冠王 加上帶領球隊拿下分區冠軍
拿下MVP的理由還不夠充分嗎?
Then again, who imagined a rookie season like Trout's?
Cabrera enters Wednesday leading the American League with 44 homers, 139 RBI
and a .331 batting average. His 137 RBI, 203 hits, 40 doubles and 44 homers
have been equaled by only Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig.
137打點 40二安 44轟的成就只有Babe Ruth和Lou Gehrig達成過
Trout, 21, produced one of the greatest rookie seasons in history, and no
player at any age has scored 125 runs with 40 stolen bases and 30 homers.
Trout打出史上最好的新秀球季之一
Trout might be the only man standing who can ruin Cabrera's Triple Crown bid
with his .325 batting average, but he can't stand in the way of his MVP
award, not with the huge disparity down the stretch.
Trout是唯一有機會搶走打擊王的人
但他搶不走MVP
Take a peek since Aug. 1 heading into Tuesday:
Cabrera: .343 with 42 runs, 19 homers, 52 RBI, .411 on-base percentage, .676
slugging, 1.087 on-base plus slugging percentage.
Trout: .284 with 49 runs, 12 homers, 28 RBI, 17 stolen bases, .381 OBP, .500
slugging, .881 OPS.
八月後的成績:
Cabrera: .343 得分42 全壘打19 打點52 .444上壘率 .676長打率 1.087 OPS
Trout: .284 得分49 12全壘打 28打點 17盜壘 .381上壘率 .500長打率 .881 OPS
If that's not enough, wrap your mind around one of the most integral aspects
to be considered in MVP balloting:
這還不夠有說服力的話 想想MVP票選最重要的面相吧
A players' impact on his team.
對球隊的影響
It doesn't matter if Trout leads the world in WAR or peace, no player in the
AL meant more to his team this year than Cabrera.
管他什麼WAR的 沒有一個球員比Cabrera對他的球隊更重要的了
Trout, for you Wins Above Replacement aficionados, might have a higher total
(10.3 to 7.1), but Cabrera actually has a higher percentage of his team total
(33.5% to 27.2%), courtesy of colleague Paul White.
Cabrera佔球隊WAR比重比Trout高
Cabrera led his team to a first-place finish in the AL Central, with the
Tigers opening the playoffs Saturday at Comerica Park.
老虎要進季後賽了
The Angels, despite an 83-57 run since Trout's April 28 call-up, will finish
third in the AL West.
天使只排分區第三
Take Trout away from the Angels this year, and Los Angeles still would have
finished next-to-last, ahead of the Seattle Mariners.
有沒有Trout 天使都只贏水手
Take Cabrera away from the Tigers, and they would have set up their golf tee
times a month ago.
沒Cabrera的話 老虎現在就要準備打PGA了
Before anyone gets cute, let's end the idea that it's inconsequential since
the Angels have two more wins than the Tigers. The Red Sox had the same
victory total as the St. Louis Cardinals last year, but we can't remember a
soul apologizing for the Red Sox.
說天使勝場比老虎多的人 想想去年的紅襪吧
紅襪去年勝場和紅雀一樣多呢
It's also time to stop with the defensive comparison. No one is arguing that
Trout is a better defensive center fielder than Cabrera is a third baseman.
防守上 當然Trout是比較好沒錯
Remember that Cabrera is the one who moved to third base, after a five-year
layoff, to make room for free agent Prince Fielder. Cabrera is hardly a Gold
Glove nominee, but he has startled scouts with his adequacy.
不過別忘記Cabrera為了把1B位置讓給Prince Fielder而無私移防三壘
Cabrera固然不是金手套 但他也不是漏洞
So now we're going to penalize Cabrera for moving from first base?
所以Cabrera要因為他的移防而招致批評嗎?
Uh-uh. Doesn't work that way.
Trout is a wonderful story, a player who overcame a thyroid condition this
spring that robbed him of 20pounds, and should be honored as the unanimous
rookie of the year winner.
Trout是很好的故事
He just won't be the MVP.
只是他不是MVP
Take a bow, Miguel Cabrera.
Cabrera 去領獎吧
作者: wsan (花火)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
翻譯辛苦了!! "八月後成績" 部份 Trout 少了 "得分" 數據~~
作者: nolimits (愛盜人)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
沒Cabrera的話 老虎現在就要準備打PGA了XD
作者: evilwyh (我相信我可以。)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
紅襪又中槍XDD
作者: o0991758566 (洨馬力)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
你太強了 光是MVP爭論的部分已經發了15篇文 偉哉~
作者: albertjet (竹林八閒)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
他的佔球隊比重是只算打者嗎?
作者: robertchun (我是大廢物)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
XDD
作者: kurtzz   0000-00-00 00:00:00
這篇有點弱...
作者: yankeefat (本人內建試製51cm連裝砲)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
這些MVP相關的文章都很沒意義
作者: rookiebear (rookiebear)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
PGA是啥啊XDDDDDDDDDD
作者: bkm1 (殷仔 加油!!!)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
其實我覺得胖卡穩拿的 就像去年V壯年 拿MVP氣勢很重要
作者: bkm1 (殷仔 加油!!!)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
Trout從火星回來地球速度太快了 隔年再拼吧!
作者: JoshBeckett (少年英雄)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
PGA就是之前謠傳紅襪投手們最喜歡的聯賽
作者: ust (應經遊俠魂)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
這篇怎麼很有說服力 = =
作者: whitemist (劍邵)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
PGA 就是去打高爾夫的意思啦 XD
作者: safeorout (安全)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
我怎麼覺得這篇論點一點說服力也沒有
作者: whalelover (哞哞哞哞王)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
反正吵半天 最後還不是看BBWAA會員爽投誰就投誰Why not just wait and see?
作者: whalelover (哞哞哞哞王)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
我覺得既然吵到現在兩派完全無法達成任何共識 就差不多該停了吧= =
作者: miabcd199 (超級喜歡周迅)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
有沒有Trout 天使都只贏水手 有點中肯
作者: miabcd199 (超級喜歡周迅)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
只是這系列文看到有點膩了..
作者: helba (網路貧民窟)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
推PGA XDDD
作者: mkoo (米糕)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
為舌麼會有兩派??? 有人以為Trout會拿MVP??????????????????
作者: SlamKai (Calm Violence)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
有阿 ~.~
作者: abc12812   0000-00-00 00:00:00
ESPN的Jayson Stark就投給Trout
作者: z2114422 (Hunting)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
這跟我18086篇的論點根本一樣 我來當專欄寫手好了
作者: lions402 (...)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
最近這種文都END 好煩.....
作者: K77251   0000-00-00 00:00:00
天使勝場和去年紅襪一樣多 講得太好了XDD
作者: saidon ( )   0000-00-00 00:00:00
去年紅襪又中槍XD
作者: a2156700 (斯坦福橋)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
老大才能拿MVP
作者: philluke (骨折)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
看到分區冠軍... LAA戰績可是比所謂分區冠軍還好....
作者: flowerkid (Never give up)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
這話題戰了好久...我猜Cabrera拿MVP...XD
作者: bband022840 (bband)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
雖然我也覺得米糕會拿,但看了這篇文後更希望TROUT拿
作者: kutar3d (庫塔)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
紅襪有夠慘 XDDD
作者: lingsk (塵俗過隙)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
等投票出來再說 勿忘10AL CY打了多少臉
作者: globekiller (世界越快 心則慢)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
紅襪去年勝場跟紅雀一樣多XDDDD
作者: yehudi (soger)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
明星賽以前我認為Trout會拿 但之後米糕起飛後 就知道結果了
作者: ykshih (失一墩)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
希望trout拿MVP來打臉+1 前年看King拿打臉好爽
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
我也好希望打臉 畢竟RBI這種數據實在是很沒意義
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
比MVP時會沒意義嗎 雖然都說RBI是運氣 因為RISP不穩定
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
AVG可能還比RBI有價值多了 雖然AVG也是眾所周知的糟
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
但是打了就是打了阿 這是貢獻
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
所以MVP真的就別再參考RBI了吧 質疑WAR可以用別的進階
作者: duncan6502 (Steve Nash)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
我也希望 分區冠軍.....? 夜郎自大
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
數據,這種憑運氣,還要跟隊友搏感情的數據......
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
MVP比的是貢獻 拿RBI來參考沒什麼錯阿隊友上壘你打的回來就是種貢獻 是實力還是運氣根本不重要
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
問題是這種貢獻是別人做球給你的 還是靠自己打回來的?如果RBI真這麼重要 那第一棒豈非原罪?
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
就算拿RISP來評論MVP我也認為沒什麼錯運氣歸運氣 貢獻歸貢獻
作者: live4132 (趙汝浩)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
Trout WAR破10 貢獻度明顯更大
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
用RISP選MVP? 別鬧了 那不如用抽籤算了 反正差不多
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
投給Trout也沒什麼不對 我只是不認為實際投票差距會有兩人
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
的WAR差距這麼大就是了我只是認為把RISP當作投MVP時的一個加分選項也很正常而已
作者: wsan (花火)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
每一個數據可以拿來 "參考" 但拿來 "決定" 就有可能會惹爭議
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
有數據可以直接決定就不需要投票了 只是參加價值多寡而已
作者: wagner (熊麻吉)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
RBI跟得點圈打擊率有相關吧 怎會不重要
作者: albertjet (竹林八閒)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
WAR算起來 Trout 是幾個 C.Gonzalez? 真的會差這麼多?
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
RISP就是一個碰運氣的數據 它最大的用途就是拿來判斷
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
哪些球員被高估(RISP太高)或低估(RISP過低)
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
運氣又如何呢 打出來就是打出來了 貢獻就是貢獻
作者: g7063068 (屏東尼大木博士)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
做球給你也要有實力打回來阿 掌握每次機會錯了嗎?
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
另外....三冠王數據與防守、走壘、送球都無涉只用三冠王也太偏頗了吧
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
掌握機會當然很好 問題是有些人一排棒次就沒啥機會
作者: g7063068 (屏東尼大木博士)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
那你就一直掌握好該有的機會 棒次就會往前啦
作者: OoyaoO (你今天崩潰了嗎 囧)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
Atro說的是Trout一棒跟米糕中心的差別這不是打得好就可以更動棒次的
作者: Atropos0723 (Atropos)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
是的 就是表現很好 棒次就往前排第一棒啦....
作者: PTTerme (童顏巨根)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
沒Cabrera的話 老虎現在就要準備打PGA了XD
作者: ryvius0723 (シロクマ)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
第一棒拿MVP的例子又不是沒有 關棒次屁事
作者: god2 (乙炔)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
不是很同意那個八月後分割法
作者: god2 (乙炔)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
另外運氣是拿來評估球員實力的,不能拿進來貶低貢獻
作者: Ayukawayen (亞布里艾爾發芽>//<)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
得分也不全是打出RBI球員的貢獻 上壘/推壘的都有貢獻
作者: Ayukawayen (亞布里艾爾發芽>//<)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
所以還是看登山路線圖(#1EPCXWaR)決定貢獻量吧(誤)
作者: chienliang7 (RyoSon)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
看到PGA狂笑XDDDDDD

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com