Re: [情報] MLB快被NBA超越了??

作者: abc12812   2012-11-03 13:29:09
推 Parazicecum:要說巨頭隊 應該MLB更誇張吧 NBA有薪資上限的限制 一 11/03 10:49
→ Parazicecum:支球隊明星收集有限 但看看之前洋基隊 或者是費城人隊 11/03 10:50
→ Parazicecum:輪值 根本變態 MLB就是有錢好辦事 沒錢萬年殿底 11/03 10:51
→ Parazicecum:NBA的弱隊還有起來的機會 MLB的弱隊頂多某一年迴光返 11/03 10:51
→ Parazicecum:照 其餘時間都是陪打的罷了 11/03 10:51
http://tinyurl.com/9hb62dr
When we look at the actual estimation of the line’s equation, though, we
note one very important issue. The link between payroll and winning
percentage in 2012 is not statistically significant.* In other words –
despite what we see when we stare at the line — we can’t argue that
payroll and winning percentage in 2012 are actually related to each other.
事實上 今年的MLB球隊勝率和薪資間是沒有統計上的顯著關係的
會讓戰績和薪資脫鉤的原因在魔球裡面有解釋過了
答案就是新人上來後要先當長達六年的廉價勞工 之後才能到FA市場上撈肥約
除此之外 棒球預測 特別是投手部分 非常困難
往往造成所謂"簽假貨"的事件
導致最後球隊表現和薪資脫鉤 (但和GM能力非常相關)
反觀NBA
http://tinyurl.com/7hxqukt
With respect to the NBA, the ceiling on salaries is causing the top players
to allocate themselves according to one specific non-salary issue. Again,
consider the LeBron saga. LeBron didn’t leave Cleveland because the
Cavaliers couldn’t afford his services. LeBron left Cleveland because he
wanted to win a title (which he did). Now it appears that Howard is
following the same pattern. And Durant’s ability to contend with the
Thunder is probably part of the reason he appears to be happy in Oklahoma.
In essence, this story is similar to what we already see in college
basketball. Why do the top high school athletes flock to Kentucky every
year? It’s not because Lexington, Kentucky is a large market. Players like
John Wall, DeMarcus Cousins, Brandon Knight, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, and
Anthony Davis went to Kentucky because they had a chance to contend for a
title. A similar story is told about players who attend Duke, North
Carolina, and Kansas. None of these schools are in large markets. But all
provide a program that consistently competes for championships.
薪資上限反倒造成頂尖球員追求高薪資以外的目標 (奪冠)
讓強隊可以用低於水準的薪水簽下頂級球員
而小球隊即使提出頂新 如果明星球員感覺看不到未來 一樣留不住招牌
作者: CORYCHAN (CORY)   2011-01-03 13:52:00
推這篇
作者: KevinLiou   2011-01-03 13:53:00
籃球單個球員的影響力本來就比棒球高
作者: KevinLiou   2011-01-03 13:54:00
一個LBJ可以抵用球隊1/6的出場時間,球員間表現又是連動不像棒球 最多1/9 而且還不連動..
作者: su43123 (無與倫比美麗的妳)   2011-01-03 14:47:00
兩種完全不同類型得運動本來就不該這樣比
作者: su43123 (無與倫比美麗的妳)   2011-01-03 14:49:00
NBA 強弱更明顯 很多都陪公子練球
作者: burdette (小熊今年得冠軍)   2011-01-03 15:07:00
NBA好看在於比賽過程 至於結局通常沒那麼懸疑
作者: a524528 (小傑)   2011-01-03 15:09:00
NBA的拉鋸賽明顯比較多
作者: burdette (小熊今年得冠軍)   2011-01-03 15:09:00
因為得分多 所以容易出現拉鋸 但強弱較明顯
作者: burdette (小熊今年得冠軍)   2011-01-03 15:10:00
藍球和棒球本身爆冷門的機會就差很多
作者: burdette (小熊今年得冠軍)   2011-01-03 15:11:00
美國奧運藍球隊 很少輸 棒球呢?完全不同
作者: seemoon2000 (no)   2011-01-03 18:48:00
籃球球隊英雄能控制球場的勝負比較大也是真的

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com