※ 引述《westterry170 (密西西北)》之銘言：
: Magic Johnson says the Dodgers aren’t going after Robinson Cano
: Aaron Gleeman Oct 4, 2013, 10:15 AM EDT
: Reports of Robinson Cano wanting a $300 million contract led to speculation
: that the big-budget Dodgers might try to steal him away from the big-budget
: Yankees, but Los Angeles owner Magic Johnson threw a bunch of cold water on
: that idea yesterday.
: 報導指出cano想要份300M的合約，這大約使人推測高預算的道奇可能會嘗試去把他從高
: 預算的洋基給搶來，但昨日道奇隊老闆Magic Johnson針對這個想法潑了個大冷水。
: Speaking to a group of reporters before Game 1 of the NLDS last night,
: Johnson said:
: 昨晚NLDS第一場賽前Johnson對大批記者說道：
這裡的a group翻成大批不太適當，一般新聞稿說a group of reporters通常只是說
多於一個，翻成"一些記者"就好
: When you’ve got to pay Clayton [Kershaw], there’s only so much you can do.
: I can’t say anything because that’s not up to just me. But a year or two
: from now, we’ve got Hanley [Ramirez] coming up, too. We’ve got guys that we
: ’ve got to keep, and so the numbers probably just don’t add up. … I can’t
: talk about the other guy [Cano], but you already know that guy in New York is
: going to be paid. Not by us. But he’s going to get paid
: 當你必須去支付Kershaw，你能做的事也就只能那麼多。我無法說什麼因為這不僅是我一人
: 所能決定。但這過去這一兩年至今，我們也獲得Ramirez加盟效力。我們必須去維持住我們
: 得到的這些夥伴，所以成員很可能無法再增加... 我無法去談論cano，但你知道他在紐約
: 會被雇用，並不是我們，而是他會去尋求雇用。
這段錯的地方很多:
"But a year or two from now we've got Hanley coming up, too"
=> "接下來一兩年我們還有Hanley Ramirez要換約"
這是未來不是過去
"We've got guys that we've got to keep, and so the numbers probaly just don't
add up"
=> "我們有現有一定得留的球員，所以錢大概不夠再多簽什麼大約"
the numbers probably don't add up不能直接照字義翻
"You already know that guy in NY is going to be paid. Not by us. But he's going
to get paid"
=> "你知道紐約那傢伙會拿到大約，這約不會是我們給的，但他會拿到大約"
Magic Johnoson並沒有說他一定認為NYY會給Cano大約，get paid在這裡就是指拿大約
這件事不是被雇用
: Obviously quotes in early October by a part owner not involved in actually
: player moves aren’t exactly binding, but we may have finally seen the first
: signs of the Dodgers actually having some payroll limits. And if the Dodgers
: aren’t in there driving up the bidding, how is Cano going to get to $300
: million?
: 很顯然地，十月初期合夥人的引述說他們不實際參與球員交易不必確切地遵守。但我們最
: 終可能看到道奇的新合約可會受到薪資總額而限制。假如道奇不幫忙抬價，cano要如何去
: 尋獲300M?
"Obviously quotes in early Oct by a part owner not involved in actually player
moves aren't exactly binding"
=>"當然一個不實際參予球員交易的球團老闆/合夥人在十月初的放話不一定要當真"
(這裡原文還有文法錯誤...XD)
"we may have finally seen the first signs of the Dodgers actually having some
payroll limits"
=>"我們總算知道躲人還是有薪資上限的"
: 引文出處：http://ppt.cc/9ybx
: 備註：有些語句不是很確定，歡迎指正!!