※ 引述《KakutougiFan (轉變在不知不覺中發生)》之銘言：
: http://ppt.cc/CkBf
: ROUND 1
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Lawal
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: ROUND 2
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Lawal
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats
: ROUND 3
: SHERDOG SCORES
: Mike Whitman scores the round 10-9 Lawal (29-28 Lawal)
: TJ De Santis scores the round 10-9 Lawal (29-28 Lawal)
: Mike Fridley scores the round 10-9 Zayats (30-27 Zayats)
: THE OFFICIAL RESULT
: Muhammed “King Mo” Lawal Def. Mikhail Zayats Decision (Unanimous) R3 5:00
: [30-27, 30-27, 30-27]
請問為何這場是Unanimous Decision,不是有兩位裁判給Lawal(29-28),
一位給Zayats(30-27),最後三個30-27的比分又是怎麼來?有誰可以解釋一下???

樓上講得沒錯, 另外我內心覺得美國比賽很重角力優勢給分並不認同, 第三回合king mo只不過個角力優勢就拿到這回合, 我認為很不合理但現在UFC跟Bellator就是這樣給分, 幾場比賽為例: Davis判定勝Machida顯示出角力優勢高於打擊, Ben Henderson判定勝Thomson顯示打擊優勢高於巴柔優勢