註:既然去年M9評價普遍慘就先挑過當作沒這台吧
不然列了當沙包也沒啥意思
Engadget
http://www.engadget.com/2016/04/14/htc-10-review/
得分：88
得分參考 (Galaxy S7:90 HTC One M8:87 iPhone 6S:91 )
優點：
Exceptional build quality
優秀的製造工藝品質
A more subtle approach to software than on previous HTC phones
軟體比以往的hTC手機更加細膩
Top-tier performance
頂級效能
First Android phone that supports Airplay streaming out of the box
第一款支援AirPlay的安著手機
Great audio through headphones
耳機輸出優良
缺點
Merely average battery life
續航只有平均水準
Camera performance falls short of some rivals
相機效能不如一些競爭對手
Sound is considerably less impressivewhen you listen through speakers
喇叭外放的能力並不讓人驚豔
Hi-res earbuds aren't included with US models
美國版不送Hi-res earbuds
Pocketnow
http://pocketnow.com/2016/04/14/htc-10-review
得分：9.0 (硬體:10 軟體:8 使用者體驗:9 )
得分參考 (Galaxy S7:9.5 HTC One M8:8.7 iPhone 6S:8.9)
優點
Amazing design and build quality
驚豔的設計以及製造工藝
BoomSound re-imagined
重新定義了BoomSound
Great display
強大的螢幕
The best of Sense, the best of Stock Android
最好的Sense搭配最好的原生安桌
Above-average battery life
好於平均的續航能力
Quick-charge 3.0 in the box
內附QC3.0
Support for AirPlay out of the box
支援Air Play
IP53 water resistant
IP53防水防塵
缺點
Camera software needs tweaking
相機軟體還需要改進
Launcher should adopt a better grid for QHD
這一句我不太確定該怎麼完整的講，原句是這樣
大致上是針對桌面圖示以及解析度對應的問題
"HTC just needs to take a full step into taking advantage of Quad HD with a
denser grid for the icons on the home screen"
Why no Hi-Res headphones in the box in the US?
為啥美國版沒有附高解析力的耳機(不然為啥美國賣比較便宜?)
A more competitive price would’ve helped
價格還需要更有競爭力(599美金還不夠嗎?)
The Verge
http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/14/11429858/htc-10-review
得分:8.0 (設計8,螢幕8,相機7,通話品質8,效能9,軟體9,續航8,軟體生態9)
參考得分 (Galaxy S7/S7edge 8.8/9.1 HTC One M8:8.5 iPhone 6:9.0)
Fast performance
飛快的效能
Reliable battery
可靠的續航
Great sound
強大的音效
Good software
良好的軟體
缺點
Boring design
無聊的設計
Slow camera
相機速度慢?
High price
貴
閒聊:跟事前被許多人擔心續航比起來，三家編輯對相機反而都比較有意見?