雖然網路上有數篇有關嘴綠的文章，可是要說最引戰的應該是這篇才對
http://goo.gl/aQQqPY
看看標題：
Draymond Green doesn't believe the Warriors actually lost to the Spurs
抓猛綠不相信勇士會輸給馬刺
重點是下面這段文章：
But astute readers will note that's only six losses. Golden State has seven.
And the San Antonio Spurs' March 16 victory is nowhere to be found on Green's
list.
但明眼人都知道這邊只講了6隊，而勇士輸了7場。馬刺的勝利Green隻字未提。
Of course, the Warriors were without Andrew Bogut and Andre Iguodala in their
87-79 road loss to the Spurs a couple weeks ago. They were forced to start
Brandon Rush. That's pretty far from Golden State's optimal lineup, so we
understand Green's point.
當然勇士少了Bogut和IGGU，使得他們一定要讓Rush先發，而這讓勇士的陣容差很多，也
可能因此成為Green在意的點。
But that understanding cuts both ways. The Warriors face the Spurs twice more
this season, and Gregg Popovich will likely rest several of his most
important players in preparation for the playoffs. In fact, San Antonio might
help pave the way for Golden State to break the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls' 72-win
record. So ... would those games against the Spurs be less meaningful?
簡單來說，POP喜歡輪休他的球員，而實際上馬刺仍然是阻礙勇士突破95-96公牛的關鍵。
所以這幾場對馬刺的比賽真的沒有意義嗎？
What makes the Warriors' pursuit of history so special is that they've come
through time and again despite fatigue, injury, bad shooting nights, and
everything else in their way. There's no need to downplay the losses that
have happened. They're part of Golden State's incredible 2015-16 story.
和標題最引戰的部分沒啥關係，不翻。
總而言之，對馬刺敗陣Green提都不提，是變成黑歷史了呢，還是不承認馬刺擊敗勇士呢
讓我們拭目以待