我覺得原文的評論比較站在球員的立場
“In this day and age you don’t see players stay with one team but he’s stil
l young and in his prime,” Pierce said on The Jump.
現今你很難看到一個球員一生只待在一個球隊，只是現在他還年輕而且處在巔峰。
“There’s going to be a lot of factors, especially with a guard, because now
you’re talking about ‘am I going to be a lifetime Blazer if they give me $10
0m-plus or $200m?’.
對一個後衛來說有很多因素會影響你留隊。因為現在我們討論的是：如果拓荒者給我100
多m或200m我是否會一輩子待在這。
“It all matters about who values you the most, especially as a guard. Kevin [
Garnett] was a big man so he was going to get paid wherever he went.
對一個後衛來說，重點是哪一隊看重你。而不像KG，他是長人，所以他到哪都有人要。
“If they feel as though they can’t move forward with Damian Lillard then I d
on’t know if they would re-sign him for that big contract.
如果拓荒者認為DL不能帶領他們前進，他們還會給這大約嗎？
“Of course he’s going to say all the right things because he has a pay chequ
e coming up pretty soon. “He would definitely love being a Blazer if he made
$200million.”
當然他現在會講好話，因為他很快會就會拿到報酬。他現在拿了200m，自然樂意當個拓荒
者。
而原文的註解是
Paul Pierce has warned Damian Lillard not to expect full loyalty in the NBA
PP提醒DL在NBA打滾不要把忠誠說的太滿。
我個人的解讀是，PP在說DL現在夠強所以他會拿到大約，但身為後衛比起長人更容易被球
隊放棄，所以不要輕易期待自己可以在一支球隊待到結束。
當然啦，同一段話百種解讀，我是不覺得PP有在酸他啦
其實我的翻譯跟新聞差不多，只是新聞加上很多記者個人想法，例如被解讀為PP在質疑DL
或是PP顯然有意見？
所以是誰解讀的？游郁香嗎？