[外絮] 聯盟裁判組解釋Harden那球灌籃不算的理由

作者: pneumo (超☆冒險蓋)   2019-12-04 15:55:34
先上影片:
水管連結: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlAkIarPbzI
推特連結: https://twitter.com/i/status/1202071139440381953
來源: ClutchPoints
網址: https://tinyurl.com/tsyv4ur
NBA Crew Chief explains why James Harden’s controversial dunk did not count
聯盟裁判組解釋為何James Harden那球爭議性的灌籃不算的原因
The Houston Rockets blew a 22-point lead against the San Antonio Spurs at the
AT&T Center, coming out of the short end of a nail-biting, 133-135, double
overtime conclusion on Tuesday.
星期二的比賽,火箭最多領先馬刺達22分,最後在兩次延長加賽後,以133-135輸給了馬
刺。
It was indeed the Rockets’ fault for letting their guard down in the final
canto, allowing the Gregg Popovich-mentored team to gain momentum and steal
the victory from their fingertips. The exhilarating game, however, was marred
with controversy when James Harden’s bizarre dunk in the fourth quarter was
waived off by officials.
火箭最後沒有守住是他們自己的問題,讓Popovich領軍的馬刺打出士氣,從火箭手上偷到
一場勝利。這場刺激的比賽的第四節Harden一個詭異的灌籃最後被裁判判不算讓這場比賽
有了一點瑕疵。
Replays showed Harden’s attempt got inside the hoop before spinning back out
again and sailing out of bounds. Given the tight nature of the ball game,
many believe that call could have had grand implications in the end game for
Houston’s favor.
重播顯示Harden球進去籃內但是又轉了出來到了籃框後轉了出去。最後比賽比數如此接
近,很多人認為若是這判罰是對Harden有利的話,比賽結果就會有莫大的影響。
The league released an official statement on Twitter shortly after the match,
which featured a conversation between NBA referee James Capers and pool
reporter Mike Monroe from the Athletic.
在比賽結束後,聯盟在推特上發表了正式聲明,裡面主要是寫到聯盟裁判James Caper跟
The Athletic記者Mike Monrow的對話記錄:
聯盟推特連結: https://tinyurl.com/rf956ny
Capers, who made the call on the floor, admitted that upon checking the
replays, Harden’s dunk should have counted since it did clear the net. The
impact of the dunk caused it to go back over for a second time, but it should
have been deemed a successful field goal.
Capers是當時在場上做這個判決的裁判,他承認在當時看影片的時候,Harden的球有穿過
網子,所以應該是要算進的。那球灌的很用力,所以就又轉回來彈到籃框上面,但是那應
該是要算一次成功的進球的。
He also made it clear that Rockets coach Mike D’Antoni failed to issue the
Coach’s Challenge in the prescribed 30-second window, which made his protest
ineligible.
不過他也明確表示,火箭教練Mike D'Antoni沒有在30秒的時間正式提出挑戰,所以他的抗
議無效。
James Harden finished with 50 points in a losing effort, but those additional
two points could have certainly played a big factor in the final score of the
match.
Harden拿下50分輸球,但是那兩分本可以對最後比賽結果造成莫大的影響的。
作者: artistno1231 (我要飛的更高更遠)   2019-12-04 15:59:00
所以灌籃不能太大力,只能輕輕的...
作者: switzerlands (瑞士)   2019-12-04 16:06:00
有了挑戰制度 結果誤判可以怪你30秒沒挑戰
作者: dixieland999 (迪西蘭)   2019-12-04 16:18:00
翻譯:裁判判錯了,但你沒有即時抗議是你的問題不要說重播,這當下看就覺得是有穿過籃圏了
作者: ginopun10477 (大腿牌)   2019-12-04 16:22:00
裁判超爛
作者: roger2623900 (whitecrow)   2019-12-04 16:28:00
這球能看錯真的很屌XD 看影片完全沒爭議的一球
作者: haoche891208   2019-12-04 16:31:00
乾挑戰不該是想挑戰的時候再挑戰的嗎這種那麼明顯的挑戰個
作者: a09898966656 (游肥)   2019-12-04 16:32:00
誤判就誤判在那邊扯什麼沒挑戰 這稍微討論看一下就知道誤判的東西 又不是那種很接近的球
作者: OGCOGCOGCOGC (吉霸昏!!!)   2019-12-04 16:34:00
雖然不喜歡鬍子 可是這看也知道進了...
作者: bluesky81411 (bluesky)   2019-12-04 16:51:00
這這麼可以不算
作者: buster520798 (Nick520)   2019-12-04 17:06:00
裁判越來越鳥
作者: wwfsmackkane (楓葉)   2019-12-04 17:28:00
樓上...改成死球後下一個play前需提出不就好了
作者: sunshinegary (陽光凱瑞)   2019-12-04 17:54:00
所以知道是錯誤判決 但你不挑戰 就成了對的判決這個邏輯真的猛
作者: ENCOREH33456 (XM3)   2019-12-04 23:31:00
就進了啊誇張欸
作者: winnerdinner (鍵盤百萬富翁)   2019-12-05 12:01:00
這球...裁判是丟搞喔.....

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com