https://tinyurl.com/yfzkjpjz
Twitter–Mark Cuban
https://i.imgur.com/z0ufyG6.png
Great response @Giannis_An34
This response should be required viewing for every sports media member and
sports journalism teacher and student. Headline seeking questions that look
good in a tweet are what sports media has devolved to far too often.
Giannis的回答很得體
所有體育圈的媒體與其教師和學生必看他的回覆。
聳動標題的提問往往只為了吸引Twitter的點閱率，這已是業界的惡性循環
It’s also on @espnand @tnt to not accept this as state of the art. Of course
not all sportswriters or beat writers fall into this category, And difficult
questions that require difficult answers need to be part of the game.
這也是@espn和@tnt的責任，拒絕聳動標題的作法。
當然，並非所有的體育記者或專欄作家都會這樣做。
尖銳的問答也應是比賽的一部分。
But gotcha questions are still far more common than insightful questions. And
questions about actual basketball strategy are rare. How far away are we
from @sportswriterGPT being a better source of post game questions ? It will
be interesting to see where this side of the industry goes
但誘導式的提問比有深度的問題更常見，實際的籃球策略的問題則很少見。
賽後提問使用 @sportswriterGPT 還有很長的距離呢？
我很有興趣看到未來的發展。
網友跟他筆戰
網友1
https://i.imgur.com/CqabiOo.png
If a team is the #1 seed, & lose in 5 games in the first round to the 8 seed
I dont understand why the question is insensitive or unfair. He has a right
to answer it in the manner he did, but could just have easily said were
disappointed but we tip our cap to Miami for beating us
如果在季後賽首輪，第1種子五戰內輸給第8種子，我不懂為何這個問題會讓人
覺得敏感或不公平。
他有權按照自己的方式回答，但也大可輕鬆地說輸球很難過，但我們要向邁阿密敬佩，
因為他們擊敗了我們。
Cuban的回答
Have you ever been in a media room after a heart breaking series loss ?
你有沒有在一場令人心碎的系列賽後進入過媒體室呢？
You can feel the disappointment. It’s hushed. It’s tense. That’s what
makes the question ridiculously bad. Particularly since he asked the same
question last year. A good reporter uses empathy and understands the
circumstances and realizes there are an unlimited number of ways to ask the
same question that doesn’t put the recipient on the defensive. But that doesn
’t happen nearly as often as it used to. And I don’t blame the reporter.
They don’t get rewarded for asking great questions that elicit greet answers
on more than one question.
你可以感受到失望、低氣壓和緊張。因此這個提問爛爆了，尤其是他去年已問過了。
一位優秀的記者會用同理心，了解當下的情況，已其他方式問同樣的問題，讓受訪者
感到自在。跟過去相比，這種情況變少了。
而我並不責怪記者，很多時候，即便提了能引出好回答的問題，也沒得到什麼好處。
Their bosses need revenue so everyone can keep their jobs. Giannis asked the
most insightful question when he asked the questioner if he had gotten a
raise this year. Chances are slim in the media industry and most likely he is
happy to ask whatever questions put him in a position to keep his job.
記者的老闆需要營收，才可保住每個人的工作。
Giannis 問了一個很有深度的問題，他問了記者今年是否加薪了。
在媒體業，這種機會很少。
為了保住工作，他可能願意會亂問
網友2回應 Cuban上面的回文
https://i.imgur.com/pHCwptC.png
The purpose of asking questions is to gain insight into another person's
mindset/emotions/worldview. Eric's question was fair & reasonable. Giannis'
reply was thoughtful/measured and gave fans a sense of his values. So it's a
great example for journalists and athletes alike.
問問題的目的是為了了解對方心態/ 情感/ 世界觀。
Eric的提問很客觀且合理。
Giannis的回答經過深思熟慮並讓球迷們了解他的價值觀。
因此，這對記者和球員來說，都是一個很好的例子。
Cuban的回答
When the response includes something to the effect of “I don’t want to make
this personal “ it’s not your typical question. You know as well as anyone
what types of questions are rewarded in this business and what kind of
responses are promoted. If any reporter doesn’t , they won’t be successful
in their job.
如果回覆包含「我不想針對你」等內容時，這就不是常見的提問。
你和其他人都了解在這個行業中，哪些類型的問題會受到獎勵，哪些回應會受到轉發。
如果記者不懂的話，他們肯定不會成功。
網友3回應Cuban一開始的推文
https://i.imgur.com/dXDoyuE.png
It’s also a good question, it gives insight into what the actual team thinks
of their season, pretty unfair to categorize it as some sort of gotcha type
of thing.
這也是一個好的提問，讓人了解到球隊對賽季的真實想法。
把這個問題，歸類為某種誘導式的提問類別很不公平。
Cuban的回答
It’s a question looking for a yes no answer that will be used as a headline
“Giannis says the season is a ….” As Giannis said, he asked the same
question last year. Good for Giannis for his response
這是一道是非題 Yes or No，會被製作成標題「Giannis表示本賽季是....」
就像Giannis說的的，他去年也被問過一樣的問題。Giannis的回答很棒。
備註
老闆招募中？