https://x.com/officialnbarefs/status/1717585075531812968
We missed the foot to foot contact which should have resulted in a personal foul
and reviewed for flagrant. Had no foot to foot contact existed, this type of se
condary and theatrical movement by Brunson would meet the criteria for a non-uns
portsmanlike technical foul for flopping. It is possible to have a foul and a fl
op on the same play, but the foot to foot contact is what causes Brunson’s move
ment and no flop should have been called.
我們漏掉了腳與腳的接觸。這本來應該是個犯規+該被重新檢視是否為惡意犯規。然後在沒有
腳部接觸的前提下，Jalen Brunson這種二次且帶有演技成分的動作符合違反體育精神犯規假
摔的標準。犯規與假摔是可以同時存在的，但腳部的接觸造成Brunson做出該動作因此Bruns
on不應該被判為假摔。

判錯要不要罰錢，被對面多罰一球欸這樣不如都賽後看ljk他意思是說被犯規的那個也有可能假摔吧以這球看應該就大頭被埋但後續動作太誇張也會被認定假摔

真的犯規 但演過頭

樓上冷靜。。。大頭這球如果後面補個攤手應該就犯規+假摔成立這種球抓本來就自找麻煩，專注在大迴環、勾手無碰撞東倒西歪跳芭蕾還比較好場中被抓的不用罰錢啊，對面罰球

所以裁判要不要罰錢

可以順便把T收回嗎

智X