The Athletic 的報導中有些細節頗耐人尋味
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5793011/2024/09/25/matthew-sluka-unlv-redshirting/?redirected=1
付費文章，僅節錄兩段如下：
According to Paulos (按: UNLV 長期贊助者), Sluka's agent emailed UNLV donors
on Aug. 28 to introduce himself as Sluka's new representation and ask to
discuss possible NIL scenarios. Paulos said UNLV donors told the agent they
couldn't engage because the agent was not registered in Nevada.
...
Blueprint Sports, which operates UNLV's NIL collective, said it did not
make a formal NIL offer to Sluka as a recruit, nor did it "finalize or
agree to" any offers while Sluka was on the team aside from one community
engagement event. Rob Sine, the CEO of Blueprint Sports, told multiple
reporters the collective made one payment of $3,000 to Sluka.
簡單來說，UNLV 方認定除了3000鎂的 relocation fee，從未正式承諾任何金錢給付，
且由於 Sluka 的經紀人並未在該州註冊，不被視作合規的對口。
近期越來越多關於 NIL deals 的討論，下面這篇文章就提到學生運動員須尋求合約保障：
https://holonlaw.com/what-disclosure-requirements-do-i-have-around-nil-deals/
# Believing verbal notice or handshake agreements suffice with brands.
Formal contracts prove critical.
# Seek binding contracts with brands, even for nominal compensation
like free products. Defined terms prevent misunderstanding.
只能說沒有白紙黑字都不可信呀....
※ 引述《icecreamdog (松鼠版約克夏)》之銘言：
: 原因是因為他沒有拿到拉內華達大學拉斯維加斯分校口頭承諾的十萬元美金「贊助金」
: UNLV 在 Matthew Sluka 的帶領下 前兩週對戰拿下勝利的學校包括休士頓大學和堪薩斯大學
: 細節原文
: https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/41438172/matthew-sluka-nil-dispute-unlv-hinges-verbal-offer
: 現在大學打一年 非power 5 聯盟的學校 可以拿到0.1M了
: