[討論] Jalen Smith的新合約

作者: lens82801 (開始QQ的見習生)   2022-02-28 18:30:12
: 推 indpa5553: Smith比較尷尬,打的好我們也留不住 02/12 10:49
: 推 larson: Jalen Smith主要是看價碼吧~畢竟要論薪資空間我們是有的 02/12 11:07
: → larson: 然後就看有哪些球隊會砸錢搶他,以及Turner和Goga的去留 02/12 11:07
: 推 indpa5553: Smith因為太陽沒撿TO,母隊最高只能開到470萬的樣子, 02/12 11:13
: → indpa5553: 跟當年的S.Hill一樣 02/12 11:13
: 推 larson: @indpa5553, 470萬的限制記得是沒有薪資空間的情況下,想要 02/12 11:30
: → larson: 使用鳥權或早鳥續約時,會因為他之前簽的新人約而被限制住 02/12 11:30
: → larson: 像是當年我們溜馬跟現在的太陽一樣都是超過cap的狀態下 02/12 11:31
: → larson: 但暑假我們的薪資空間騰出來後應該就不存在這個問題了吧~ 02/12 11:32
我本來的觀念跟larson大一樣,以為只要有薪資空間就沒問題,不過後來看到推特跟
reddit都在討論這件事就去翻了Larry Coon,終於找到相關規定,發文記錄一下:
http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q47
Teams have until the October 31 preceding the player's second regular season
to exercise their option for the player's third season. Likewise, they have
until the October 31 preceding the player's third regular season to exercise
their option for the player's fourth season (see question number 57 for more
information on options). If the team invokes both options (keeping the player
for all four seasons) and submits a qualifying offer after the fourth season,
then the player becomes a restricted free agent (see question number 42 for
more information on restricted free agency). If the team declines either
option, then the player enters free agency as an unrestricted free agent.
However, if the team declines either option and the player becomes a free
agent, the team cannot re-sign him to a salary greater than he would have
received had the team exercised its option. In other words, teams can't
decline an option year in order to get around the rookie salary scale and
give the player more money. This applies to all types of signings, including
the Bird exception, the Mid-Level exception, and cap room.
上色部分是重點,只要沒有執行新秀合約第三、第四年任一個球隊選項,該球員在休賽季
成為UFA,且母隊開出的新合約不能超過原本球隊選項的價碼,以Jalen Smith的案例來看
就是4.67M。不論用何種方式簽約都受此限制,包含鳥權、中產跟薪資空間。
新合約的長度跟選項的部分沒看到詳細規定,如果有人知道相關資訊再麻煩補充一下!
Jalen Smith交易後在我們這邊打得挺不錯的,給了機會表現卻沒辦法留下來會有點可惜
,我們能給他最好的合約應該就起薪4.67M+第二年PO了。
作者: larson (哉哉)   2022-02-28 19:58:00
看來規則有變,之前翻NBAGM板的精華區,當年湖人就是用特例簽下沒有跑完新秀合約的Devean George不過主要看Smith本人怎麼想吧~ 畢竟是FA,也要有其他隊伍願意砸更多的錢,然後看Smith是否想留下來
作者: lavida   2022-02-28 20:19:00
他最近表現應該遠超過470萬吧。覺得留不下來,感覺很可惜
作者: seventhree83 (國父)   2022-02-28 20:25:00
我覺得以Carlisle的用人,以後說不定就常常擺出三後衛+SF+C來應戰了;這樣一來留不住他也不會太可惜
作者: acura123 (acura123)   2022-02-28 22:47:00
之前在太陽有看,Smith適合小球5號,但看他到溜馬數據,似乎長出3分投射能力。不過在有Turner Goga等長人競爭,加上今年也可能選優質長人新秀,是否還需要Smith?
作者: arrowsean (sean)   2022-02-28 23:35:00
查了一下CBA,溜馬要簽回Smith的話除了起薪受限其他應該就比照鳥權,開滿就是4.67M起薪 8%漲幅的4年約

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com