※ 引述《kcbill (明日やろうは馬鹿野郎だ)》之銘言：
: Novak Djokovic seeks injunction against deportation from Australia
: https://on.ft.com/3JLy51X
: 看到金融時報的報導，擷取比較重點的幾段
: Tennis Australia has argued that the exemption was approved by two committee
s
: of medical professionals — one appointed by a tennis body and another by Vi
ct
: oria’s department of health — but it was not known on what grounds Djokovi
cw
: as successful.
: 澳洲網協說給囧醫療豁免是經過兩個委員會核准的，一個是網協指定的，另一個則是維
多
: 利亞州的衛生部所指派的。但沒有人知道囧的醫療豁免是根據什麼來核准的。
: Reasons for an exemption could include proof of an adverse reaction to Covid
v
: accines or recent major surgery. A test proving an infection within the past
s
: ix months, seen as a potential avenue for unvaccinated travellers to obtain
an
: exemption, is not an adequate reason, according to the Australian governmen
t.
: 醫療豁免可以是對打疫苗有不良反應，或是近期動過大手術等。但六個月內曾經感染過
，
: 並不被澳洲政府承認可以因而豁免不用打疫苗入境。
: Australia opened its borders to fully vaccinated non-citizens in mid-Decembe
r.
: Djokovic would have qualified for a visa used for sports professionals, but
h
: e would still have had to comply with strict vaccination rules to enter the
co
: untry.
: 這段有點奇妙，它寫說囧適用於發給運動選手的簽證，但囧還是需要遵守打疫苗才可入
境
: 的規定。
: Paul McNamee, a former chief executive of the Australian Open and men’s ten
ni
: s champion, said that the world number one had been made a “victim” of a p
ol
: itical dispute between the national and Victorian state governments, and the
e
: ffort to deport him could undermine confidence in the Open.
: 澳網前執行長說囧是聯邦政府跟維州州政府政治鬥爭下的犧牲品。
: Scott Morrison, Australia’s prime minister, said visitors were still welcom
e
: but they needed to comply with the country’s Covid policies. He denied Djok
ov
: ic had been “singled out”.
: 澳洲總理說歡迎旅客來澳洲，但他們必須遵守防疫規定。總理否認說故意針對囧。
: Tennis Australia has said that a handful of players were given exemptions to
p
: lay, raising accusations that Djokovic was being used as a political scapego
at
: . Morrison dismissed that suggestion, and argued that the people who posted
on
: social media or elsewhere about their travel status “draw significant atte
nt
: ion to themselves”.
: 澳洲網協表示也有其他選手獲得醫療豁免，讓囧其實是政治鬥爭的代罪羔羊的指控升溫
。
: 澳洲總理則不認同那種說法，強調那種把自己的旅遊狀態po在社群媒體上的人，他們本
來
: 就要承受更多的關注。
: “Anyone who does that — whether you’re a celebrity, a politician, a tenni
s
: player, a journalist — whoever does that, they can expect to be asked quest
io
: ns more than others. That’s how the Border Force works,” he said.
: 總理說，不管是名人、政治人物、網球選手、記者，只要他們做了那樣的事（po在社群
媒
: 體），他們都要預期會因此被邊境管制的人盯上。
: 我不太熟澳洲政治，但看起來聯邦政府是自由黨的，然後維州政府是工黨的，所以囧的
事
: 件有人延伸成政治鬥爭，好像算解釋得通？
: 我有問我澳洲朋友的感想，她說雖然她討厭囧，但囧被卡在邊境，她覺得是政治動作啦
。
: 搭配這篇報導裡總理說的話，感覺澳洲的邊境管制一般應該是不會特別刁難入境的人，
不
: 會到去仔細check相關證明，但囧太高調po文，所以才會上演現在這齣卡在機場的戲？
https://i.imgur.com/iPdZLiE.jpg
最新新聞是Novak提出的文件幾乎是最下限，而且只有一個醫生背書。跟其他提出有實際
內容的豁免文件選手比充分度「少了非常多」。
這裡也提到其他選手都有超過一個醫生以上的背書，而Novak大部分的文件都是澳洲網協
一個單位提供的而已。
https://i.imgur.com/zBDTE1E.jpg
一位聯邦高層則是說Novak的文件完全就不足，而且也提供不了任何新的東西出來，他們
是能怎樣？
澳網則是生氣政府是為了政治爭鬥故意針對Novak。
我自己的看法是澳網協會為了讓Novak可以出賽去跟很多政商關係喬，但聯邦那邊早就說
了不給他喬。然後出發前的PO文引起澳洲廣大民怨，搞的對他更嚴格而已。
比較好奇的是州政府到底當初有沒有答應澳網跟Novak要幫他喬擔保進來。