聽說台積電的晶片比三星的貴70%
假設三星的賣20美元
台積的賣34 美元
差 14 美元
iPhone一台賣650美元
成本也只差2～3%
那蘋果怎不多用台積的？
反正2～3%沒差不是嗎？
※ 引述《mmmmmfff (發牢騷！)》之銘言：
: 原文請跳轉
: http://www.macrumors.com/2015/10/08/apple-a9-chip-2-3-percent-difference/
: 全文以及翻譯如下 翻譯有我個人加油添醋的語氣，不喜歡的話請看原文。
: （其實看第一段就夠了）
: Over the past several days, a slew of battery tests on the iPhone 6s and the
: iPhone 6s Plus have revealed some performance differences between
: models that have an A9 chip manufactured by TSMC and those with an A9
: chip created by Samsung. While variousbenchmarking and real world usage
: tests have shown differences of 6 percent to 22 percent, in favor of TSMC
: chips, Apple says that its own testing has shown battery life variations of
: only two to three percent.
: 在過去幾天，有大量兩種版本晶片製成的6s與6s plus的電力測試。
: 台積電與三星的A9晶片，在多方測試之下，有著6~22%的電力續航力差距。
: 但是蘋果認為，實際的差異只有2~3%而已。
: In a statement given to TechCrunch, Apple says that it has done internal
: testing and gathered customer data to determine the performance difference
: between the two chips in the iPhones.
: 在一份給TechCrunch的聲明稿中，蘋果表示經過內部測試以及蒐集了消費者的資料。
: 兩種晶片的差異已經有了結果。
: With the Apple-designed A9 chip in your iPhone 6s or iPhone 6s Plus, you are
: getting the most advanced smartphone chip in the world. Every chip we ship
: meets Apple's highest standards for providing incredible performance and
: deliver great battery life, regardless of iPhone 6s capacity, color, or mode
l.
: Certain manufactured lab tests which run the processors with a continuous
: heavy workload until the battery depletes are not representative of real-wor
ld
: usage, since they spend an unrealistic amount of time at the highest CPU
: performance state. It's a misleading way to measure real-world battery life.
: Our testing and customer data show the actual battery life of the iPhone 6s
: and iPhone 6s Plus, even taking into account variable component differences,
: vary within just 2-3% of each other.
: 我們設計的A9晶片根本是科技的尖端，你拿到的是世界上最棒的手機。
: 無論你拿哪個型號或顏色，你都可以得到最棒的效能、卓越的電量、快樂的人生。
: 最近很多人在幫我們做不同製成晶片的電力測試，喔，拜託，誰會那樣測。
: 現實生活有誰會拿著手機24小時不斷的讓CPU滿載阿。根本一點也不現實。
: 在一般日常使用下，電力只會差2~3%啦。
: Apple says that early battery benchmark tests conducted by customers,
: such as those weshared yesterday, are not reflective of real world usage
: conditions. The two to three percent difference that Apple has seen in data
: gathered from customers is "well within its manufacturing tolerances" and is
a
: level of variation that could be seen between two devices with the same chip
.
: Apple's statement on real world usage reflects what recent YouTube tests hav
e
: revealed. Side-by-side battery tests comparing a TSMC iPhone and a Samsung
: iPhone did not show differences as dramatic as benchmark tests have shown,
: but those videos are also not quite indicative of real world usage results.
On
: MacRumors forums, opinions on battery life have been highly mixed. While som
e
: users with Samsung chips have reported poor battery life, others have not
: reported issues.
: 這兩段只是做總結，基本上跟前面說的差不多，懶得翻了。
: 總之，蘋果承認兩種晶片有差異，但認為這只是公差的正常值。
: 不要噓我QQ，我只是在等官網開賣無聊，轉貼新聞不是在護航。
: