[情報] 一篇關於版友討論時常犯錯誤的文章

作者: Iamaidiot (神經病)   2004-09-03 13:15:37
http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/attack.php
Attacking the Person (argumentum ad hominem)
Definition:
The person presenting an argument is attacked instead of the argument itself.
This takes many forms. For example,the person's character, nationality or
religion may be attacked. Alternatively, it may be pointed out that a person
stands to gain from a favourable outcome. Or, finally, a person may be attacked
by association, or by the company he keeps.
There are three major forms of Attacking the Person:
ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks
the person who made the assertion.
ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author
points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the
person's circumstances.
ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person
does not practise what he preaches.
Examples:
You may argue that God doesn't exist, but you are just following a fad. (ad
hominem abusive)
We should discount what Premier Klein says about taxation because he won't be
hurt by the increase. (ad hominem circumstantial)
We should disregard Share B.C.'s argument because they are being funded by the
logging industry. (ad hominem circumstantial)
You say I shouldn't drink, but you haven't been sober for more than a year. (
ad hominem tu quoque)
Proof:
Identify the attack and show that the character or circumstances of the person
has nothing to do with the truth or falsity of the proposition being defended.
References:
Barker: 166, Cedarblom and Paulsen: 155, Copi and Cohen: 97, Davis: 80

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com