[新聞] 龐巴迪向菲航交付全世界首架兩艙等Q400

作者: nyrnu (B-18901)   2017-07-30 15:04:13
[媒體名稱]Flight Global [新聞日期]2017/7/21
[網址]
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/
bombardier-delivers-first-dual-class-86-seat-q400-439527/
颱風天貼一些與颱風無關的訊息,不然快被洗版了.
龐巴迪向菲航交付全世界首架兩艙等Q400
86-Seat in Total
Premium Economy: 10-seat with 33-inch pitch
Economy: 76-seat with 29-inch pitch
ATR72-600 30-inch pitch; 座位略佳但飛比較慢
Q400 29-Inch pitch; 座位擁擠但飛比較快
鄉民你要選那一種?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bombardier delivers first dual-class 86-seat Q400
21 JULY, 2017 SOURCE: FLIGHT DASHBOARD BY: JON HEMMERDINGER BOSTON
Bombardier has delivered its first dual-class 86-seat Q400 turboprop, handing
over the aircraft to Philippine Airlines on 20 July.
PAL became the first customer for the configuration in December 2016 when it
signed deals that included firm order for five 86-seat Q400s and purchase
rights for an additional seven aircraft. The carrier recently converted those
seven options to firm orders at the Paris air show.
PAL has chosen to outfit their aircraft with 10 premium seats with 33in pitch
and 76 economy seats with 29in pitch.
Thai low-cost carrier Nok Air already operates seven 86-seat Q400s, albeit in
an all-economy configuration. It was the launch customer for the high density
variant of the aircraft, which typically carries 76 or 78 passengers.
Bombardier will deliver five Q400s to PAL this year and seven in 2018, Flight
Fleets Analyzer shows.
Bombardier has been marketing a 90-seat all-economy variant of the turboprop
since February 2016, but has yet to land any customers for the denser
configuration.
作者: Roslin (Roslin)   2017-07-30 15:59:00
區域航線飛快飛慢會差到哪嗎
作者: ATR72 (文人相輕自古皆然)   2017-07-30 16:01:00
唯一支持ATR72
作者: kugh2005 (我愛台鐵)   2017-07-30 16:06:00
國內ATR也有兩艙等啊,貨艙加客艙~
作者: coolfish1103 (Fish)   2017-07-30 16:08:00
29... XD
作者: taxlaw1991 (taxlaw91)   2017-07-30 16:11:00
有鄉民就一直提要買Q400不要ATR咩
作者: lawson (未來絕對值得期待)   2017-07-30 18:15:00
http://i.imgur.com/TeaZLbI.jpg台灣ATR72-600足矣
作者: gitans (阿左)   2017-07-30 18:36:00
兩種我都搭過但是Q400內部空間看起來大一點點
作者: xylophone135 (赤い三月花雪夢)   2017-07-30 19:01:00
唯一支持ATR72
作者: macings (Zach)   2017-07-30 20:10:00
區域航線距離拉長Q400優勢就有了,但台灣沒這種航線
作者: ttnakafzcm (燦's)   2017-07-30 20:35:00
台灣的航線長度用ATR就好 用Q400效益比ATR糟 飛機還比ATR貴 真的是傻了才買Q400 加上又友軟腳事件
作者: suzukihiro (慢慢的等待)   2017-07-30 21:14:00
我怎麼覺得ATR椅距大一點
作者: starbuckser0 (不應侷限於兩條平行線內)   2017-07-30 22:25:00
搭過ANA的Q400 舒適~
作者: aitt (君子之交淡若水(M))   2017-07-30 23:43:00
ATR比較麻煩的地方在於空難紀錄與機率有些高
作者: ttnakafzcm (燦's)   2017-07-30 23:53:00
不會開怪東西爛XD GE的ATR失事記錄幾乎都是人為因素
作者: aitt (君子之交淡若水(M))   2017-07-30 23:57:00
國外的ATR也是一堆空難紀錄
作者: wx9950a (Penghu.a-ming)   2017-07-31 00:16:00
大家都在玩同一機種,選不一樣的沒比較好
作者: Andriy6016 (阿群)   2017-07-31 08:49:00
旅客還不是問:啊有沒有噴射機
作者: relio (瑞哩歐)   2017-07-31 11:18:00
Q400優勢明顯很多
作者: xylophone135 (赤い三月花雪夢)   2017-07-31 12:43:00
又扯空難率zzzzz
作者: macings (Zach)   2017-08-01 05:07:00
Q400對比ATR的優勢在爬升快飛的快,但台灣就算北高航線這種短程距離Q400根本只有燒油錢的優勢Q400如果真的適合台灣市場,那B7操作過很長時間的DHC 8 -200跟300怎麼不繼續買Q400,DHC-8家族國際上也摔過好幾架

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com