[閒聊] 疑似因為政府關門而延遲了MAX軟體更新

作者: ttnakafzcm (燦's)   2019-03-11 12:02:34
波音去年11月底說6-8周後提供MAX軟體更新
照時程推算是一月 但那時候政府關門中..
目前還不敢肯定 軟體更新延宕真的是因為政府關門
但軟體更新延遲到三月或四月才發布是肯定的
所以MCAS的BUG現在還在....Orz
https://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL1N20X080
AFRICATECHMARCH 11, 2019 / 7:01 AM / UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
UPDATE 2-Boeing's 737 MAX back in spotlight after second fatal crash
Tracy Rucinski, David Shepardson
5 MIN READ
(Adds Boeing postponing media event)
By Tracy Rucinski and David Shepardson
CHICAGO/WASHINGTON March 10 (Reuters) - The latest version of Boeing Co’s
best-selling 737 family - a global industry workhorse - has again been thrust
into the spotlight after a fatal crash in Ethiopia, months after a deadly
crash involving an identical brand-new jet in Indonesia.
A Nairobi-bound Boeing 737 MAX 8 operated by Ethiopian Airlines crashed
minutes after takeoff from Addis Adaba, killing all 157 on board. The same
model flown by Lion Air crashed off the coast of Indonesia in October,
killing all 189 on board.
There are still unanswered questions about the causes of the Lion Air crash,
and officials and safety experts said it was too soon to draw links with the
Ethiopian incident.
Boeing did not respond to questions about the 737 MAX 8 on Sunday but said in
a statement it would send a technical team to the crash site to provide
assistance.
Boeing’s shares lost 12 percent in the weeks following the Lion Air crash,
but have more than recouped those declines, closing on Friday at $422.54, 18
percent higher than before the Oct. 29 incident in Indonesia.
Boeing’s 737 MAX is the newest version of a jet that has been a fixture of
passenger travel for decades and the cash cow of the world’s largest
aircraft maker, competing against Airbus SE’s A320neo family of single-aisle
jetliners.
The decades-old 737 family is considered one of the industry’s most reliable
aircraft.
Boeing rolled out the fuel-efficient MAX 8 in 2017 as an update to the
already redesigned 50-year-old 737, and had delivered 350 MAX jets out of the
total order tally of 5,011 aircraft by the end of January.
Former NTSB Chairman Mark Rosenker said the catastrophic crashes of two new
airplanes soon after the 737 MAX 8 was introduced were “highly unusual” and
both had broad similarities in that they went down soon after takeoff.
While it is unclear if there is a direct link, “this is now an extraordinary
issue” for aviation safety officials to grapple with and will prompt a
sweeping investigation to determine if there are common issues, Rosenker said.
Dallas-based Southwest Airlines Co is the biggest operator of the MAX 8, with
31 aircraft, followed by American Airlines Group Inc and Air Canada with 24
each.
Southwest and American said on Sunday they remained fully confident in the
aircraft and were closely monitoring the investigation.
Aviation analyst Scott Hamilton cautioned against drawing comparisons between
the two crashes, especially before the black box recorders are recovered.
Ethiopian has a strong reputation and good safety record, he said in a blog
post.
Still, the crash puts fresh pressure on Boeing just days before it had
planned an event to debut another aircraft.
Late Sunday, Boeing said it would postpone the planned ceremonial debut of
its 777x widebody aircraft that had been set for Wednesday in Seattle and was
to be livestreamed.
The company said it is focused on “supporting” Ethiopian Airlines and “
will look for an opportunity to mark the new plane with the world in the near
future.”
INVESTIGATION AND LITIGATION
Following the Lion Air crash, Boeing faced criticism from some U.S. pilot
unions for not having detailed in its flight manual a change in the way that
software on the MAX reacts in a stall compared with a previous version.
Boeing has insisted that cockpit procedures were already in place to deal
with problems that the Lion Air jet experienced.
A preliminary report into the Lion Air crash focused on airline maintenance
and training, as well as the technical response of the anti-stall system to a
recently replaced sensor, but did not give a reason for the crash. Since
then, the cockpit voice recorder was recovered and a final report is due
later this year.
Boeing was expected to introduce a software patch to help address the
scenario faced by the Lion Air crew in late March or April, government and
industry officials told Reuters in recent weeks.
Boeing is already facing a string of lawsuits in the United States by
families of the Lion Air crash victims, including five cases in U.S. federal
court in Illinois where Boeing has its Chicago headquarters.
The 737 MAX 8 uses LEAP-1B engines made by CFM International, a joint venture
of General Electric Co and Safran SA. (Reporting by Tracy Rucinski in Chicago
and David Shepardson in Washington; Additional reporting by Tim Hepher in
Paris, Allison Lampert in Montreal and Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by
Peter Cooney and Marguerita Choy)
作者: PONANZA (電王)   2019-03-11 12:05:00
是要跟政府機關一起code review嗎....
作者: Vett (Vett)   2019-03-11 12:11:00
這連疑似的程度都沒到
作者: sweet16kate (低調的Kate)   2019-03-11 12:25:00
這理由牽拖有點大
作者: sam455205 (sam455207)   2019-03-11 12:26:00
所以都沒更新?
作者: gemilay (Peri)   2019-03-11 12:34:00
波音是政府機構嗎?
作者: scopeowl (飛翔的貓)   2019-03-11 12:37:00
理由很爛
作者: cyclohexane (Xuan)   2019-03-11 12:37:00
波音跟美國政府的關係是。。。?
作者: nrl952006 (小安)   2019-03-11 12:52:00
害人不淺...... 這理由
作者: domago ( )   2019-03-11 13:01:00
不太相信 這麼重要的更新可以拖延
作者: Yijhen0525 (深雪)   2019-03-11 13:25:00
私人公司跟政府有什麼關聯.....這理由真的不是推託之詞嗎....
作者: GaryMatthews (G公*)   2019-03-11 13:33:00
跟米國政府有什麼關係 飛機製造商又不是他們
作者: chewie (北極熊)   2019-03-11 13:38:00
如果說發布更新需要經過NTSB審核 那就也許有關係 類似之前
作者: mjonask (不是啦)   2019-03-11 13:38:00
這也太罔顧人命了吧?
作者: chewie (北極熊)   2019-03-11 13:41:00
挪威航空故障迫降伊朗那次引擎拿不到出口許可?應該是FAA 說錯
作者: ttnakafzcm (燦's)   2019-03-11 13:43:00
如果是要FAA審核那就還行 但如果不是 那這理由很爛
作者: xvited945 (sk0k0)   2019-03-11 13:51:00
所以軟體更新需要FAA審核囉說真的,FAA這種重要機構根本不該受關門影響...我媽同學在聯邦政府上班,她說某些機關是不會被關門的,那段時間依舊要正常運作
作者: cgy (北台灣東部丘陵線籌備處)   2019-03-11 14:09:00
AD/SB當然要FAA審核
作者: court0043 (紅色十月)   2019-03-11 14:12:00
https://bit.ly/2F1PnIX看起來是波音自己都還沒決定要改到什麼程度,還不到審核的程度(在等獅航事故的進一步調查).
作者: domago ( )   2019-03-11 14:14:00
適航證明可以燒了
作者: Yijhen0525 (深雪)   2019-03-11 14:40:00
難道不能用重大影響飛安的理由先更新嗎.....還是說就只能眼睜睜看著發生卻無法作為?
作者: tomho1202 (never regret)   2019-03-11 15:19:00
BS...
作者: happyennovy (喵)   2019-03-11 15:20:00
牽拖機率比較大,波音很意外嗎
作者: coolfish1103 (Fish)   2019-03-11 15:32:00
波音沒人甩鍋要怪政府了?
作者: sandiegopadr (???)   2019-03-11 15:38:00
原來是垃圾啊 我還以為是波音呢
作者: yuinghoooo (KiXeon)   2019-03-11 17:19:00
那就美國人自己坐就好了,其他國家可以先升級啊
作者: qwe753951 (滑倒)   2019-03-11 21:08:00
沒人感喊停飛啊,利益牽扯太龐大了,就這樣讓不安全的飛機繼續飛
作者: court0043 (紅色十月)   2019-03-11 22:24:00
波音想要的修正程度是不會在獅航訴訟中不利,之前就全推給獅航訓練及pilots了。歷史上名古屋空難空巴也的確有成功。
作者: lwei781 (nap til morning?)   2019-03-12 03:01:00
為了 legal 害死更多人

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com