You can now filter Steam reviews by playtime
https://www.pcgamesn.com/steam/review-playtime
That Steam user review that lists thousands of hours played and ultimately
says “it’s okay” was funny the first time, but by now that particular gag
has worn pretty thin. Luckily, Steam has just implemented a new set of
filtering tools to let you narrow down opinions by how long users have played
the game, and there are some other improvements around playtime tracking, too.
Alongside the existing review sort tools, you’ll find a dropdown marked ‘
playtime.’ You can choose minimums like one hour, ten hours, or 100 hours,
or run a custom filter for anything up to triple digit hour counts. So if you
feel a gaming opinion is only valid from someone who has played precisely 16
to 34 hours, for example, you can get exactly those sorts of reviews.
The new filter settings in particular are labeled as a Steam Labs feature, so
it seems Valve has plans to use that experimental branding for certain
features that are directly implemented into the store. Other Steam Labs
features for the store – like the new search – have required you to opt-in
for access. Not so here.
You’ll also now find two separate playtime counts attached to every review.
One shows the total time that player has spent with the game overall, while
the other shows the count at the time the review was published. That means
you can now properly distinguish a first-hour negative review when that
player has gone on to play a dozen more.
Valve’s starting to make more frequent adjustments to the Steam store, so don
’t be surprised if you find more little improvements next time you log on.
====
簡單來說,Steam又加入新功能了。
https://i.imgur.com/snQWGBl.jpg
評論過濾功能現在可以選擇只看遊戲時數多長以上的玩家所發佈的評論了。
而且現在會在評論上標示出「評論發表時的遊戲時數」和「遊戲總時數」。
作者:
kopune (ç„¡é™æœŸæ”¯æŒ i☆Ris)
2019-09-27 11:37:00蛙 這樣雲大師怎麼辦
作者:
Pocer (就4論4)
2019-09-27 11:38:00這個不錯
作者:
andy0481 (想吃比叡的咖哩)
2019-09-27 11:38:00過濾掉免費仔雲大師
作者:
alinwang (kaeru)
2019-09-27 11:39:00德政,免除未玩就亂噴的雲玩家.
作者:
justeat (小玉)
2019-09-27 11:39:00哀 為了評論只好掛機
為了雲評論自己買了沒玩的遊戲掛機湊時數感覺就很無謂
作者:
chuckni (SHOUGUN)
2019-09-27 11:47:00☁ 過濾器XD
作者:
asd065 (DUG)
2019-09-27 11:48:00文明帝國表示;
作者: ThanAlil 2019-09-27 11:50:00
玩了3000小時 給他反串負評也沒關係啦
作者:
arcss (捷比)
2019-09-27 11:51:00FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION 範圍:全語言、100小時+目前顯示 2,072 篇符合上列篩選條件的評論 ( 極度好評 )雲玩家會崩潰吧 XDDD
覺得是爛遊戲還玩十小時以上,代表評論的人腦袋有問題,所以評論也不會準
作者: haseyo25 2019-09-27 11:55:00
結果發現文明帝國沒有評論,因為超過時間的玩家還沒玩完
你們都忘了 Steam遊戲玩超過兩小時就不能退費了
作者:
Dirgo (靜!)
2019-09-27 11:56:00玩不久->雲意見不值得看 玩很久->反串文
作者:
dnek (哪啊哪啊的合氣道)
2019-09-27 11:59:00以此功能祭還願在天之靈
作者:
arcss (捷比)
2019-09-27 11:59:00FF15把範圍改10小時+也是極度好評,縮到3小時+變成大多好評
作者:
arcss (捷比)
2019-09-27 12:00:00(79%),真的沒這邊喊得有多爛
時間較短的負評有時也具參考價值 像是bug無法運行之類
作者:
ClawRage (猛爪Claw)
2019-09-27 12:06:00誰會覺得遊戲超爛還玩個10小時再評論 搞笑喔
作者:
atbhao05 (mxhao)
2019-09-27 12:08:00雲過濾 讚我覺得才玩10分鐘是要怎麼評斷一個工作室半年一年的作品
作者:
YoruHentai (*゜ー゜)b )
2019-09-27 12:08:00我看NBA2K20玩家都是玩超長然後怒噴啊LUL
作者:
zeolas (zeolas)
2019-09-27 12:14:00這個很好,可以過濾一些評論大師不過說實在的,遊戲時數應該會跟評論成正比吧畢竟也不可能一直玩爛遊戲阿
作者:
zeolas (zeolas)
2019-09-27 12:17:00應該會以兩小時為基準吧,過濾那些退費的雲大師
作者:
widec (☑30cm)
2019-09-27 12:30:00GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD設一百小時後一看......中國玩家還真的是愛玩又愛噴吶
作者: Kedge (0.0) 2019-09-27 12:42:00
也一堆人海賊王每集收看然後在那邊噴的呀xD遊戲都會有優缺點,時數3000的大佬評論感覺就特別可靠
作者:
iam0718 (999)
2019-09-27 12:49:00雲過濾器
作者:
DDG114514 (AN/SPY-114514)
2019-09-27 13:18:00反觀12%平台
作者:
bnn (前途無亮回頭是暗)
2019-09-27 13:18:00玩了十小時對餵屎結局不爽給負評還行吧
作者:
lbowlbow (沉睡的小貓)
2019-09-27 15:31:001000小時還噴,你是文明帝國玩家吧