Neo,
很多這類文章啊！
Here's The Point: Calvinists and Non-Calvinists in the SBC
https://founders.org/2016/05/03/heres-the-point-calvinists-and-non-calvinists-in-the-sbc/
How Calvinism Is Dividing The Southern Baptist Convention
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/06/how-calvinism-is-dividing-the-southern-baptist-convention_n_3399504.html
Are Southern Baptist Calvinists Just Misunderstood?
https://www.christianpost.com/news/southern-baptist-calvinist-misunderstood-richard-land-172140/
（剛好跟您說的相反餒！）
Southern Baptists, Arminians, and Calvinists
http://baptist21.com/blog-posts/2016/southern-baptists-arminians-calvinists/
Will Calvinism Split The Southern Baptist Convention?
http://sbctoday.wpengine.com/will-calvinism-split-the-southern-baptist-convention/
‘Non-Calvinist’ Southern Baptists issue statement of beliefs – by Staff
http://theaquilareport.com/non-calvinist-southern-baptists-issue-statement-of-beliefs-by-staff/
While Calvinists have been present in Southern Baptist life from its earliest
days and have made very important contributions to our history and theology,
【the majority of Southern Baptists do not embrace Calvinism. Even the minority
of Southern Baptists who have identified themselves as Calvinists generally
modify its teachings in order to mitigate certain unacceptable conclusions 】
(e.g., anti-missionism, hyper-Calvinism, double predestination, limited
atonement, etc.). The very fact that there is a plurality of views on
Calvinism designed to deal with these weaknesses (variously described as “
3-point,” “4-point,” “moderate,” etc.) would seem to call for
circumspection and humility with respect to the system and to those who
disagree with it. For the most part, Southern Baptists have been glad to
relegate disagreements over Calvinism to secondary status along with other
important but “non-essential” theological matters. The Southern Baptist
majority has fellowshipped happily with its Calvinist brethren while kindly
resisting Calvinism itself. And, to their credit, most Southern Baptist
Calvinists have not demanded the adoption of their view as the standard. We
would be fine if this consensus continued, but some New Calvinists seem to be
pushing for a radical alteration of this long-standing arrangement.
推 neohippie: 美南現在迦爾文是大宗，幾乎沒有人自稱是阿民念的 11/14 22:38
→ neohippie: 有阿民念頃向的應該會離開美南吧 11/14 22:39
→ neohippie: 以前Billy Grahm影響力很強的時代比較頃阿民念 11/14 22:43
→ neohippie: 這個世代的領導者，Mohler、Moore、Piper 都是 11/14 22:44
→ neohippie: 頃向迦爾文 11/14 22:44
推 neohippie: https://goo.gl/8k4QcZ (美國的新迦爾文主義近代發展) 11/14
22:50
這裡有一篇The Calvinism Advisory Committee所撰寫的《TRUTH, TRUST, and TESTIMONY in a TIME of TENSION》。SBC Convention建議大家看的。
http://www.sbclife.net/Articles/2013/06/sla5
【We must stand together in rejecting any form of hyper-Calvinism that denies
the mandate to present the offer of the Gospel to all sinners or that denies
the necessity of a human response to the Gospel that involves the human will. 】
Similarly, we must reject any form of Arminianism that elevates the human
will above the divine will or that denies that those who come to faith in
Christ are kept by the power of God. How do we know that these positions are
to be excluded from our midst? Each includes beliefs that directly deny what
The Baptist Faith and Message expressly affirms.
這裡講的很清楚，SBC要全力抵制極端加爾文主義（Hyper-Calvinism），而
John Piper是Hyper-Calvinism的主要代表人物。照您的講法，SBC現在整個
倒向了Hyper-Calvinism？但是，事實並不是這樣啊！是不是您的信息來源
有誤？