1.媒體來源:
The Telegraph
The Washington Post
2.完整新聞標題/內文:
Iraq crisis: Isis jihadists 'seize Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons
stockpile' - live
以及
Rebels seize former chemical weapons plant; Sistani urges formation of new
government
http://ppt.cc/PDd4
http://ppt.cc/LR7E
4.備註:
只是篇快訊
可是不是說海珊沒化學武器嗎? 不是鐵證如山說沒有嗎?
怎麼忽然就有了呢而且就在巴格達附近??!!!
這真是太神奇了到底是怎麼變出來的吼!!
我忍不住想到歐威爾的1984 Doublethink啊!
下面說是former chemical plant
可是根據CIA的報告裡面確實有化學武器
Quote Stockpiles of chemical munitions are still stored there. The most
dangerous ones have been declared to the UN and are sealed in bunkers.
Although declared, the bunkers contents have yet to be confirmed. These areas
of the compound pose a hazard to civilians and potential blackmarketers.
Numerous bunkers, including eleven cruciform shaped bunkers were exploited.
Some of the bunkers were empty. Some of the bunkers contained large
quantitiesof unfilled chemical munitions, conventional munitions, one-ton
shipping containers, old disabled production equipment (presumed disabled
under UNSCOM supervision), and other hazardous industrial chemicals.
這跟石油真的一點關係都沒有
最終目的還不是要把目前還穩定的伊朗跟之顛覆失敗的敘利亞拖下海
Telegraph這篇http://ppt.cc/YQVi報導美國背後贊助恐怖組織
參議員Ted Cruz 這幾天也在質問聯邦政府是否有武裝ISIS
敘利亞失敗之後我本來以為美國終於暫時沒轍了
但現在老子真他媽配服想出這招的人
"How about we invade Iraq again with the same excuse?"