作家指柯P考慮到美國會作證 訪談沒錄音
無黨籍台北市長參選人柯文哲今發表聲明，澄清葛特曼（Ethan Gutmann）著作《大屠殺
》（The Slaughter）書中涉及柯部分內容，與事實不符，並說該次訪談有現場錄音，請
作者詳查當時錄音內容，便可確認書中講述情節與柯文哲實際訪談內容有極大落差。
不過，人權律師童文薰晚間在臉書貼出葛特曼在《大屠殺》中的兩個註釋，其中葛特曼在
註3提到，「我（作者葛特曼）很少在書籍出版前透露我的採訪內容。但我認為柯醫師的
證詞是非常重要的，而我們的採訪並沒有錄音。因此為求精準，我將以下的草稿先給柯醫
生過目。柯醫師在上面簽了名。我做了一些小修改。」
葛特曼在註9中也提到，「經雙方同意，我們在2008年的談話是不列入記錄的。去年，我
問他是否允許我公佈我記錄下的關於他在中國的經歷。隨著本書草稿最後期限逼近，理善
（葛特曼助理）問柯醫生，是否我們能說出他的名字？他同意，但有一點需要注意：他無
意對記者們複述這些，但他會考慮在美國國會或同等機構宣誓作證」。（吳家翔╱台北報
導）
童文薰貼出葛特曼在第9章的兩段註釋原文：
Note 3. I seldom run my writing by an interview subject before publication,
but I consider Dr. Ko’s testimony to be extremely important. Because we did
not record our interview, in the interests of accuracy I gave Dr. Ko an
advance draft of the following section, and he signed off on it. I made a few
minor edits.
Note 9. These are facts that I learned while searching for a photograph of
Dr. Ko, who was not particularly well-known when I interviewed him. By mutual
consent, our conversation back in 2008 was off the record. Last year I asked
him if he would allow me to publish my account of what he experienced in
China. As the deadline for the book draft approached, Leeshai asked Dr. Ko if
we could reveal his name. He consented with one caveat: he is not interested
in repeating this account for reporters, but he would consider testifying
under oath in the US Congress or an equivalent political body.
http://ppt.cc/ags1
重點
一 沒錄音?
二 柯P有簽名 內容有修改?
三 柯P考慮在美國國會作證?