[情報] Oakland Breaks Off Talks With Iwakuma

作者: accprote (宗痛好酸靈)   2010-11-22 07:54:43
4:58pm: Slusser writes that the figure Iwakuma was said to be seeking was
including the posting fee. She also notes that Iwakuma wasn't looking for the
same number of years as Zito, just the same annual salary. Oakland, on the
other hand, was thinking somewhere along the lines of a $3MM-$5MM salary.
The A's are also looking for a power hitter, and one thought was that signing
Iwakuma could have made Oakland a more appealing destination for Hideki
Matsui.
Slusser says she recently spoke with a scout who saw Iwakuma pitch in Japan,
and described the 29-year-old as "Nothing special. Just a guy." With Iwakuma
presumably out of the picture, Slusser says a healthy Outman would be the
frontrunner for the fifth starter job. The 26-year-old lefty was having a
strong season in 2009 before he underwent Tommy John surgery and missed all
of 2010.
3:38pm: The Athletics have broken off talks with Hisashi Iwakuma, according
to this series of tweets from Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle.
While the A's will have until December 7 to make a decision on Iwakuma,
Slusser's sources have told her that Iwakuma was seeking something similar to
Barry Zito's seven-year, $126MM contract with the Giants to sign in Oakland,
which the A's are obviously unwilling to do. Iwakuma is preparing to announce
his return to the Rakuten Golden Eagles at an upcoming fan fest.
If Iwakuma's demands don't come down, the A's will be down one fifth starter
option, having traded Vin Mazzaro to Kansas City in exchange for David
DeJesus. Slusser says the A's will then approach the season with Josh Outman,
Tyson Ross, and Bobby Cramer as fifth starter candidates, barring a free
agent signing of course.
It's not unthinkable that the A's would venture to free agency to find a
suitable replacement; they clearly have the money to spend on pitching should
they see fit. Oakland bid around $17MM to win the rights to negotiate with
Iwakuma, but that amount will be returned if no deal is reached.
作者: xmth   2009-01-22 08:12:00
如果綠帽談不成,其他隊可以來談麼?
作者: rex9999 (雷哥司)   2009-01-22 08:20:00
是把樂天放哪去了…
作者: kazumi66 (ふぅ☆Bryce♪(*′ω‵*))   2009-01-22 09:19:00
不行 看來這樣真的會續留日本了
作者: Sizemore24 (newborn in Tampa)   2009-01-22 09:29:00
回1F,入札制度是允許是有這個可能性。
作者: Vierro (卡卡)   2009-01-22 09:35:00
這樣當初那些其他競爭的MLB球隊有機會麼? ex:水兵
作者: ThomasHSNU (mimura *^^*)   2009-01-22 10:11:00
擋一下同區很好啊 沒證據是故意擋的 看看又不用錢
作者: darklight36 (回去談何容易)   2009-01-22 10:37:00
日本新聞都是說如果跟得標的球隊談不攏,必須要等一年
作者: darklight36 (回去談何容易)   2009-01-22 10:38:00
才能再次使用入札,其他沒得標的球隊是沒辦法談的
作者: carmelo1125 (阿官)   2009-01-22 10:52:00
所以入札只是提價談談看 不是付了入札之後才能談約??
作者: darklight36 (回去談何容易)   2009-01-22 11:03:00
入札只是大家競標跟選手談約的機會,跟契約如何無關
作者: darklight36 (回去談何容易)   2009-01-22 11:04:00
如果像這樣契約沒談成,當然球隊也可以把競標的錢拿回
作者: Sizemore24 (newborn in Tampa)   2009-01-22 11:06:00
錯了,競標的錢是等成交時一起給的,所以沒有拿回來這
作者: dish (盤盤)   2009-01-22 11:07:00
主要是上次松坂的前例,怕有球隊惡意競標.大聯盟可以視情況把談判權判給第二隊
作者: Sizemore24 (newborn in Tampa)   2009-01-22 11:07:00
件事,另外我看到的版本是 Bud Selig 是有權裁決如果第
作者: Sizemore24 (newborn in Tampa)   2009-01-22 11:08:00
一順位跟球員談判失敗,後面順位可能可以替補。
作者: claus (La Jolla)   2009-01-22 11:21:00
#15Va8-KO 之前大概整理某篇paper的文章競標要同時提出財力證明
作者: claus (La Jolla)   2009-01-22 11:22:00
至於如果真的有那個錢但沒有認真去談會怎樣 就不清楚了
作者: externaload (Vision of disorder)   2009-01-22 15:13:00
你這篇新聞出處在哪 我怎沒找到
作者: impose (向左走還是向右走)   2009-01-22 15:28:00
這篇是出自mlbtraderumors
作者: chngyh (來自橫濱破倉庫的路人)   2009-01-22 16:04:00
作者: chngyh (來自橫濱破倉庫的路人)   2009-01-22 16:05:00
美日紳士協定,請看第11~13條的內容,就可以說明一切了
作者: chngyh (來自橫濱破倉庫的路人)   2009-01-22 16:06:00
順便補充一下,這是英文版,不要拿不會日文這種理由不看喔

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com