不太清楚狀況的的人 看了討論串之後，
還真會以為達爾是不是輸薛澤輸到脫褲了...
這2位除了勝投數 根本就伯仲之間
遮住勝投不看，達爾贏面還比較大...
一些說薛澤隊上內野胖子群跟達爾金手套內野不能比
這就很牽拖了...好吧 把內野胖子給換成金手套群
薛澤即使ERA 2.9 ->修正 2.7～2.8
但金手套群給不了的RS全沒了 變成13~14勝
這CY還能是第一FAVORITE嗎？
取國外球迷討論-說科蕭勝投之少的討論串 剛好也提到一些CY競爭者
Kershaw had a 3.77 ERA... in his LOSSES. That's 9 times the Dodgers got a
: 3.77 starer and gave that starter the loss. Add in his 1.80 ERA in 8 no
: decisions, and you have 17 games with a 2.80 ERA. Think about that. Have you
: ever seen a pitcher put up a 2.80 ERA over 17 starts and get NO wins? That's
: what happened to poor old Clayton this year.
: Just for reference, ERA in losses, no decisions, of other cadidates:
: Fernandez: 5.68, 1.77
: Wainwright: 5.60, 4.57
: Iwakuma: 5.35, 2.88
: Darvish: 3.88, 2.98
: Scherzer: 5.29, 3.33
: Notes:
: -Darvish's ERA in wins is 2.05, giving him the smallest difference between
: his ERA in wins and in losses. It looks like he was consistent, then the
: Texas offense either picked him up or it didn't.
: -Scherzer's 2.45 ERA in wins is the highest ERA in wins of all the candidates
: above. Let's go back to my point above. Scherzer had 21 starts where he put
: up a 2.45 ERA and got the win EVERY TIME.
上面是說科蕭17次先發 ERA2.8 一勝難求
其他一些投手 在輸球以及無關勝敗的ERA 分別是
: Fernandez: 5.68, 1.77
: Wainwright: 5.60, 4.57
: Iwakuma: 5.35, 2.88
: Darvish: 3.88, 2.98
: Scherzer: 5.29, 3.33
達比修拿勝投的ERA 2.05 是所有投手裡面 拿勝投敗投差距最小，
薛澤的勝投ERA是2.45 全部投手裡面拿勝投ERA最高者 且 當他ERA2.45時勝投是全拿。
條子在他達比修前23場先發平均只拿3.08分，這種投手無法控制的數據......
水兵打擊也是...bj4
當然勝投多絕對是加分。其他勝投較少的投手並不至於比較差 甚至更好，
以IWAKUMA DARVISH的ERA都還比薛低，有同樣RS 勝投都衝到22-23勝也說不定。