http://tinyurl.com/mtx5nar
In the suit, Rodriguez alleged the Players Association “completely abdicated
its responsibility to Mr. Rodriguez to protect his rights under the
agreements between MLB and MLBPA.” He also contended independent arbitrator
Fredric Horowitz, who reduced A-Rod’s suspension from 211 games, “exhibited
a manifest disregard for the law” and “acted with evident partiality.”
A-Rod指控工會"沒有負起責任保護好A-Rod的權利"
仲裁員Fredric Horowitz"無視法律" "偏袒"
The lawsuit details several complaints in which Team A-Rod alleges the
Players Association, long viewed as one of the most effective and powerful
unions in the United States, declined to intervene on Rodriguez’s behalf.
Among them (in addition to Weiner’s interview) are the failure to stop MLB’
s civil lawsuit against Anthony Bosch, which led to Bosch cooperating with
MLB; a refusal to let A-Rod select his own representative (instead of the PA’
s general counsel David Prouty) to the three-person arbitration panel; and a
lack of effort to halt media leaks about Rodriguez’s case.
告工會 沒阻止MLB和Bosch合作 拒絕讓A-Rod挑選他自己的人加入三人仲裁小組
沒阻止媒體洩密
As for Horowitz, Team A-Rod alleged the arbitrator, a baseball fan, issued a
ruling favorable to MLB because he didn’t want to get fired like his
predecessor, Shyam Das, did after acquitting Ryan Braun. The Players
Association also can fire an arbitrator, although it has never done so. The
suit purported MLB had offered Rodriguez a 162-game suspension last August if
he had agreed not to appeal, and Horowitz arrived at that same number in an
effort to appease MLB.
告仲裁員Horowitz 怕像Shyam Das (Ryan Braun案仲裁員)一樣被火
所以作出禁賽的判決討好MLB