※ 引述《MrDK (DK)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《PAULJOE (愛的獵人近藤勳)》之銘言：
: : http://sports.ltn.com.tw/news/breakingnews/1436500
: : 〔體育中心／綜合報導〕
: : 知名籃球評論網《Baseketball Insiders》公布聯盟最強25人，
: : 將之評比為7個等級並分析其優劣，詹姆斯（LeBron James）、柯瑞（Stephen Curry）
: : 榜上有名，卻不屬同個區間。
: : 值得一提的是，近來「運動畫刊」評比百大球星，「老大」Kobe Bryant自24名跌落54名
: : ，此次的Basketball Insiders的名單中，竟將Kobe踢開，以「遺珠之憾」來形容手握5枚
: : 戒指的他，令人不勝唏噓。
: : 最高層級的球星由詹姆斯領銜，隨後是杜蘭特（Kevin Durant）、戴維斯（Anthony
: : Davis）、柯瑞（Stephen Curry）及魏斯布魯克（Russell Westbrook），排行前3的球員
: : 被譽為「改變世代者」，對NBA歷史意義重大。
: Basketball insiders完整排名
: 第一等級
: 1 LeBron James
: 2 Kevin Durant
: 3 Anthony Davis
: 第二等級
: 4 Stephen Curry
: 5 Russell Westbrook
: 6 Blake Griffin
: 7 James Harden
: 8 Chris Paul
: 第三等級
: 9 DeMarcus Cousins
: 10 Kyrie Irving
: 11 John Wall
: 12 Damian Lillard
: 13 Paul George
: 14 Jimmy Bulter
: 第四等級
: 15 LaMarcus Aldridge
: 16 Marc Gasol
: 17 Dwyane Wade
: 第五等級
: 18 Chris Bosh
: 19 Dwight Howard
: 20 Klay Thompson
: 21 Kawhi Leonard
: 22 Tim Duncan
: 第六等級
: 23 Kevin Love
: 24 Carmelo Anthony
: 25 Al Horford
原文網址在這
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/ranking-the-nbas-top-25-players-in-tiers/
The endeavor is as old as the game itself.
“Who’s the best player?”
It’s a question that is as difficult to answer as it is to best Stephen
Curry in a three-point shootout. For me, the question of ranking players is
most difficult because there is no specific metric or criteria to determine
which player is “better” than another. Some would look at advanced
statistics to determine how efficient a player is and compare them to others.
But me? I think doing that unfairly penalizes a player who simply doesn’t
have much around him. While efficiency certainly does play a role in how “
good” a particular player is, I more determine a player’s value based on
his ability to impact multiple facets of the game.
The difficult part about ranking players, generally, is the inability to
easily compare players across positions. A center won’t be a dominant
assist-maker, just as a point guard won’t usually provide superb rim
protection.
Is Stephen Curry “better” than Chris Paul because of what Curry
accomplished last season? Or is Paul better because he has been arguably the
top point guard in the league for a sustained period? Are we sure that
Anthony Davis is “better” than DeMarcus Cousins? Or should Davis have to
continue his dominance for at least another year or two before he is anointed?
And finally, we must ask ourselves the age old question: What have you done
for me lately? Or, more appropriately, perhaps, “What have you done for me
lately, and does it matter?” In short, for our purposes, it does not. Our
top 25 is based on what we expect from the ranked players this upcoming
season, paying very little attention to what they have contributed in years
past. Tim Duncan, based on this, deserves somewhat of a benefit of the doubt.
As does Paul George… But does Derrick Rose? Probably not.
Tough to say…
But not as tough as ranking the NBA’s top 25 players for the 2015-16 season
was.
作者大概的意思是
每個人心中最強的球員都不一樣
因為沒有一個絕對的標準
有些人會用效率來評論
作者並不喜歡用效率來做為唯一的評論
因為如果有專門為特定球員打造戰術
那麼效率自然會高
但不代表效率高的一定是比效率低更好的球員
作者偏向於用"各方面影響比賽的能力"
判斷個球員的價值
這份top25的名單
是他認為下個球季能表現最好的前25位球員
有翻錯的話請指教一下 感謝