另回一篇有人說資料沒正確性 (也沒說那裡錯??)
就簡單隨便看一下這篇文章說的一小小點
※ 引述《xross (xross)》之銘言：
"Rebuilding the Racket Compiler with Chez Scheme"
https://blog.lambdaclass.com/rebuilding-the-racket-compiler-with-chez-scheme/
網上資料挺豐富的 我覺得不難找 例如這篇長文說 Chez Scheme 超快沒對手
"Chez Scheme's biggest claim to fame is its performance. It has always been
among the best-performing Scheme implementations."
"Its performance has no match among other schemes and it has a long history
of being used in production."
然後我們看到網路上有人22年中又做了一次測試
https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/
https://i.imgur.com/7LrnyMq.jpeg 截圖
注意
chez-9.5.5-m64 也就是 Chez Scheme
racket-8.5/r7rs 也就是上面那篇長文說 racket 要重搞 基於 Chez Scheme
petite-9.5.5-m64 以前 Chez Scheme (快版)要賣錢時 免費試用迷你基本(慢)版
mit-11.2 mit-scheme
根據截圖右半邊 結果57種測試 mit通過52項 Chez相關的3種版本皆通過57項測試
根據截圖左半邊 Chez Scheme 有最多第一名 迷你基本版一般 但也有幾個第三名
所以我覺得這篇訪談長文絕對不是一句不可信可以打死的 供參
"mit-scheme is one of the best (and oldest) scheme implementations, but day by
day it is more and more clear that it is slowly sinking into oblivion."
https://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/x9puwq/