※ [本文轉錄自 Christianity 看板 #1Ov8lsxF ]
作者: theologe (表達你我的信仰~) 看板: Christianity
標題: [討論] Siecienski的和子論史一書的書評
時間: Wed Apr 5 14:17:22 2017
A. Edward Siecienski（簡稱AES）2010的著作：
The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy.
https://goo.gl/gX44Kd
除了作者訪談這篇很值得參考外，
amazon上面就有一篇清楚介紹本書論點的書評，摘錄如下：
https://goo.gl/OzzQ53
By Jacobon June 23, 2011
.....
Siecienski's method is to read the fathers' and theologians' arguments per
the internal relationships of the Trinity and avoid any type of simple
reduction into a "pro-Western" or "pro-Eastern" model, except where the case
is obvious like in Photios, Aquinas, and Anselm. This is an important move.
When Western fathers like Hilary and Ambrose say that the Spirit proceeds et
filii or even Filioque, Siecienski denies they are saying what later
Filioquist polemics say they are saying. What Siecienski implies but does not
say is important: these fathers do not teach the development of the filioque
, and if they do not teach the development of the filioque, they are actually
witnesses to the normativity of the Eastern model.
The hero of this story is St Maximus the Confessor. He demonstrates a way to
interpret Western fathers who spoke in language similar to the filioque as a
way of expressing the eternal relationship between the Son and the
Spirit

不好意思，懶得理您！謝謝合作！

讓資料講話即可，你既已誤讀，本就無話可說。

不好意思，我要去蹲馬桶。謝謝合作！