唉，懶得回應這種抹黑。資料在這裡，大家自己比較就好了。
自由主義與改革宗無關？
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schleiermach
Friedrich Schleiermacher
German theologian and philospher
Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher was born on November 21, 1768, in
Breslau, Lower Silesia (now Wroclaw, Poland). Despite his being 【the son of
a Reformed clergyman】, Schleiermacher studied under the Moravian Brethren
(Herrnhuters), gaining from them an appreciation for the Latin and Greek
classics and a strong sense of religious life. He found the teaching of the
Herrnhuters too restrictive, however, because the faculty refused to lecture
on current intellectual trends. In 1787 he entered the University of Halle,
where he studied the philosophies of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant.
After his ordination in 1794 he accepted a position as a 【Reformed preacher
】 in Berlin. There he mingled with German romantic philosophers, became a
friend of Friedrich von Schlegel, and began a translation of the works of
Plato. Apart from a period when he was professor of theology at Halle
(1804-07), most of his life from his ordination in 1794 until his death was
spent as a preacher and teacher in Berlin. From 1810 he was professor of
theology at the newly founded university there.

(′・ω・`) 燃燒生命的最後一章 ~ The End ~

感恩老魚，讚嘆老魚～ 到底是路德宗敬虔派影響士來馬赫多，還是改革宗神學影響士來馬赫多呢？我們請號稱改革宗的同學們，來說說士來馬赫對於改革宗的繼承內容。更不要說自由神學的核心--歷史主義，其源頭是從哪裡來的不過硬要扯加爾文，不如說就是「人文主義」吧；但為何歷史主義（方法稱為歷史批判）建構了自由神學？這部份人文主義，或者加爾文神學，都無法說明。

感恩師父，讚嘆師父，我直指的重點都沒有回應到，卻搞得一副都說明完畢的樣子，果然弟子們又要傳為美談了～原創的、有生命力的自由神學出於德國的路德宗傳統，並且現在仍然都還在蓬勃發展中；而現代的基要主義則是發展於改革宗的陣營；但這些現實狀況都不重要，反正師父說得算士來馬赫神學的核心：「絕對依賴的感覺」跟敬虔派神學關係比較少，跟加爾文神學關係比較大，是這樣的嗎？XD德國的路德宗跟改革宗基本上是分不太開的，例如改革宗的潘霍華也是言必稱馬丁路德；德國的神學，就是在路德宗的影響底下。但這也造就了自由神學的優點及缺點。你們只談缺點，正因為不理解整個脈絡；結果變成把加爾文當成自由神學的老祖宗XD