※ 引述《hamasakiayu (ayumi)》之銘言：
: 如果有乳頭解放的支持者
: 拍攝自己的未成年的女兒
: 將照片上傳到FB上面
: 這個人在美國會不會出事呢？
: 美國佬開的FB又會做何反應呢？
: 從乳頭解放的觀點來看
: 只有男性可以上空，女性不行
: 並沒有年紀的限制
: 公園的老阿伯，與兒童池的小男孩都是上空啊
: 所以放個公園的老阿嬤，與泳池的小女孩上空
: 對乳頭解放運動也是很正常的呢？
An image is child pornography if it is a visual depiction of someone who
appears to be a minor (i.e., under 18 years old) engaged in sexually explicit
conduct (e.g., vaginal or anal intercourse,oral sex, bestiality or
masturbation as well as lascivious depictions of the genitals), or
sadistic or masochistic abuse.
An image of a naked child (e.g., in the bathtub or at a nudist
colony) is not considered child pornography as long as the child is not
engaging in sexually explicit conduct, or the focus is not on the child’s
genitalia. Visual depictions of adults who look like children (e.g., a 35
-year-old man play-acting in diapers, or an obvious woman dressed as a
school girl) are not child pornography. If you don't think it's a minor,
it probably isn't child pornography.
米國對Child porn的定義
基本上就是說
如果是正常的場合露點而且又沒有過分強調該對象的性徵
就沒有關係
正當場所包含天體營 游泳池 浴室等
youtube上就有很多天體營幼女的影片 其實都沒啥問題