Re: [閒聊] 棒子爺 VS 普侯斯

作者: abc12812   2011-10-25 13:12:00
推 lingjj:3.史上單季52+轟裡頭(共31人)14次來自類固醇世代 確定有問 10/25 07:19
→ lingjj:題的Bonds、阿肉、馬怪和索沙占10次 04年後只有4次 10/25 07:22
推 lingjj:把標準降到50轟 則從10:4變成11:6 還是很懸殊 10/25 07:40
推 lingjj:把標準提高到55+轟就更有趣了 10/25 07:43
摘錄自一個十年前對用球的研究:
http://steroids-and-baseball.com/changing-baseball.shtml
彈性: Platek and Gregory conducted another series of bounce tests on the pills;
the scientists conducted about 20 drops with each. They found that the average
height of the bounces from the 1995 and 2000 pills, when dropped from a
height of 182 inches, was 83 and 82 inches respectively. None of the pills
from 1963, 1970, and 1989 averaged over 62 inches. The newer pills each
bounced at least 1/3 higher than the older ones.
結構: The URI study showed that baseballs from two well-separated years in the
post-1993 era (1995 and 2000) were very like each other, yet very different
from balls from pre-1993 years; it also showed significant categorical
differences between the older Spalding and newer Rawlings balls. The Penn
State study showed a marked increase in zip from 1977 on. All that agrees
with the stats-indicated and common-sense indicated belief in a big jump when
the ball maker was changed between 1976 and 1977, as well as the belief that
there was a subsequent jump starting in 1993 and in full force in 1994.
很多事情不是只看表面數據加上腦補就可以說明一切的
(看看今年日職打擊降多慘,怎麼沒人懷疑是不是之前禁藥爽爽吃?)
作者: EVA96 (鍵盤親衛隊)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
恩! 看不懂
作者: externaload (Vision of disorder)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
又在腦補了 唉
作者: AWainwright (我將再起)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
還不是靠__球
作者: pasaword (P幣拿來)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
日職今年真的很誇張...
作者: bbdirty5566 (尊爵不凡藍鳥40)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
依你的觀點 這篇好像也是腦補
作者: PlayStation3 (超級喜歡于小文)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
可憐的56。
作者: ppoll2 (Stat Counseling)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
恩恩
作者: filla (太陽がいるから)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
又在__了
作者: borriss (松)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
因為罷工球迷跑掉太多 <=這才是腦補
作者: lingjj (觀察員)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
你有沒有看本文結論?結論是93年後的球沒啥差別(本文只比到
作者: lingjj (觀察員)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
2000年)但和93年以前的球差別甚大 而我比較的是類固醇世代
作者: lingjj (觀察員)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
前後 要反駁我說我腦補可以 好歹拿個2003、04年前後的用球
作者: lingjj (觀察員)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
比較文吧!隨便拿一篇英文研究來搞笑喔?

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com