※ 引述《NKN (99%是眼鏡與吐槽)》之銘言：
: 不知道這教授用來參考的28場海戰是哪幾場
原始文章為Bigger Fleets Win
https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/january/bigger-fleets-win
28場海戰參考表如下
https://i.imgur.com/NTYSpVJ.jpg
海軍以小勝大只有三次：
拜占庭-維京/斯拉夫/阿拉伯人
葡萄牙-馬穆魯克/土耳其
英國-其他
I’ve heard a lot of people saying recently, ‘Quantity has a quality all its
own.’ And I just want to be clear: No, it doesn’t.
..not only does quantity have a quality all its own, but it also almost always
proves decisive in naval warfare when professional competence is equal.
數量不僅僅能代表素質
並在雙方素質相當時 扮演決定性的角色
When professional naval competence and strategic acumen were equal, the
larger fleet usually won, even when the smaller fleet possessed technological
advantages at the start of the conflict.
A primary reason is that technological advantages were inevitably short-lived.
即使較小的艦隊在技術上有優勢
最終往往仍是較大的艦隊獲得勝利
因技術優勢的時間往往很短暫
Inspired by Professor Hughes’ work, my decades of research have brought me
to this conclusion: In a naval struggle between near-peers, mass (numbers),
and the ability to replace losses bests technological advantage.
教授的研究指出 實力相當的海軍
數量和彌補損失的能力 勝過 技術優勢
有趣的觀點 大家可以看看