大家最想看的Palmer 分析來了(雖然不是影片)
來源：
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/48583803
I've been at odds with the Formula 1 stewards before - both during my career
and after it - but this time I'm in complete agreement. Sebastian Vettel
deserved his five-second penalty in the Canadian Grand Prix.
我之前在職業生涯時和之後看法都跟F1 賽事裁判不一致 - 但這次我完全同意。
Sebastian Vettel 應該要在Canadian GP 受到5秒的判罰。
The Ferrari driver had driven a perfect weekend, until his mistake on lap 48
of 70. But in that moment he simply cracked under moderate pressure from
Lewis Hamilton and it cost him the race.
這位法拉利車手在本周末一直表現完美，直到他在70圈正賽中的第48圈犯了錯。
但在那當下他只是承受不住來自Lewis Hamilton 的壓力並且這讓他輸掉了比賽。
By the letter of the law, Vettel was guilty.
根據賽事規則條文，Vettel 是有過失的。
He either crowded another driver off the circuit - Hamilton into the wall on
the exit of Turn Four, to the point where the Mercedes driver had to anchor
on the brakes to avoid a collision.
他要嘛會將另一名車手擠出賽道 - Hamilton 會撞上四號彎出口的牆直到這位梅
奔車手必須剎車來避免碰撞。
Or, as his defence said, his natural momentum took him across the full width
of the circuit. But in that case he is guilty of rejoining the circuit in an
unsafe manner, as he was not in full control of his car, to the extent that
he ran Hamilton off the road in an unsafe manner.
或者，就像他的辯護說法那樣，慣性使得他穿過整條賽道。但在那種情況下，他
觸犯了以不安全方式重新進入賽道的規則，因為他並沒有完全控制住他的車，在
某種程度上他是用一種不安全的方式將Hamilton 擠出賽道之外。
One of these scenarios has to be correct.
這些狀況必有一種是正確的。
If he was forced to run all the way into Hamilton, that's not safe. If he
wasn't, then he deliberately did it, and that's not fair and deserves a
penalty.
如果他是被迫要用盡整條賽道撞上Hamilton，那是不安全的。如果他不是被迫的，
那他是故意這樣做的，這並不公平，值得懲罰。
You can't have it both ways, and you need to have it both ways to avoid the
penalty here.
不專業翻譯，若有錯誤或翻不好的地方請參照原文。
PS: 底下還有好長一段在講關於他對其他車手/車評認為不應該判罰的看法
但太多了就不翻了，請看原文~~~
PPS: 只想節錄這句話："Whatever the reason(s), it doesn't excuse another
basic error from a four-time world champion."
(不論理由是什麼，這都不是一位四冠王犯下基本錯誤的藉口)