: → GSXSP: 那就還是P1的討論阿, 參考看看Greg Koukl的解釋和定義吧 10/22 15:03
: → GSXSP: 可以解釋成矛盾證法, 但其實只有contra-positive 比較簡單 10/22 15:06
: → GSXSP: Greg Koukl用的敘述就比較直接 如果OM存在, G就存在 10/22 15:09
你可以看看你貼的影片下方某個人寫的
寫得還不錯
CryptographicVisions:
The Bible was written thousands of years ago... there are many moral issues
today that aren't discussed in the Bible. He only went over really basic
moral issues, not even considering modern ones like nuclear weapons or stem
cell research. Biblical writers would have never imagined the issues we deal
with today. And another issue to consider is that God broke his own rules.
God said not to kill in the ten commandments but later commanded his own to
kill. This is subjective morality. Is it moral because it is moral or
because god said it is moral? If God can change the moral guidelines when he
feels like it, then it was nothing more than a flexible rule to begin with.
The Bible's morality evolved just as the society writing it evolved.
簡而言之 我的理解是 Greg Koukl所說的標準化道德量測始終無法解答所有尺度問題
他永遠舉例最明顯最極端最基本的例子
那那些無法標準化的呢?比如說這個回應提到的幹細胞研究
根本無法回答嘛
這種知識體系(或模型)無法一以貫之的講述多面向問題那我要他幹麻
另外有個影片還滿推薦的
不知道板上是否討厭這個人 XD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj9oB4zpHww
其他我就不贅述了 交由Sam Harris講給你聽
他的說法能涵蓋到更廣的區域