A nothing will serve just as well as a something about which nothing could be
said.
這句話好像是維根斯坦講的，我有點不清楚他想要表達甚麼，有人可以解釋一下嗎？
感謝。

無與無規定性在邏輯學上無法區分他想表達的是 存在論根本地不在邏輯學的範圍之內用康德的話："存在"不是謂詞